Laserfiche WebLink
Staff would remind the Planning Commission that hardcover and lot coverage variances have <br />consistently been denied for reconstruction on similar sized (approximately '/a acre) lots in the '/a acre <br />and 1 acre zones over the past 4 years. The comparison with the '/a acre zone is a fair one since the <br />hardcover, setback and lot coverage standards are virtually identical with those of the l>acre zone. <br />Recent lakeshore rebuilds (2002-2003) that compare with the current proposal include: <br />- Soojian at 4496 North Shore Drive (100' width, 0.55 acres, no HC or lot coverage variances <br />granted) <br />- Twidwell at 1865 Concordia Street (102* width, 0.56 acres, granted 32.4% HC due to tree <br />hardship limiting home placement, no lot coverage variance) <br />- Lindberg at 3440 North Shore Drive (100* width, 0.47 acres, met all HC and lot coverage <br />limits, no variances) <br />- Goldberg at 1160 Loma Linda Avenue (113' width, 0.68 acres, no HC or lot coverage <br />variances grant<*d) <br />• Cable at 3532 Ivy Place (100' width, 0.522 acres, denied variances for HC exceeding 25%) <br />Staff recommends tabling the application to allow the applicants to decrease hardcover in the 75’ <br />to 250 ’ setback zone to no more than 25% by redesigning the proposed home. For example, a <br />home set at the 30 ’ street setback with a 600 s.f. driveway and 100 s.f of sidewalk could have a <br />footprint of 1,600 s.f.. <br />lt03-288( Dr. Dennis and Diane Killian <br />4/23/2003 <br />Page 6 of! <br />' ^