04-28-2003 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Pertinent Code Sections: 1.Section 10.22, Subd. 1(B) and Section 10.56, Subd. 16 (C): Structure within 75’ of lakeshore: To permit a second story deck to be located 27.5’ from the OHVVL of Lake Mirmetonka where 75’ is required. 2.Section 10.22, Subd. 1 (B) and Section 10.56, Subd. 16(C)(6): To permit encroachment into the average lakeshore setback. The total encroachment is approximately 5 ’. 3.Section 10.03, Subd. l‘*(C): Lot coverage: Regardless of lot area, every developed lot shall be allowed at least 1,500 square feet of lot coverage by principal residence and garage structures. To permit a variance to allow lot coverage to be 1,650 s.f. where 1,500 s.f. was previously approved. 4.Section 10.22, Subd. 2 and Section 10.56, Subd. 16(L)(1): Hardcover in 75-250 ’ setback: To permit 2,115 s.f. (26.4%) of hardcover in the 75-250 ’ setback zone where 2,079 s.f. (26"/o) was previously approved. Discussion: The subject property was purchased by the applicant in 2000. The plan was to demolish the existing residence and cor^nuct a new residence on the property. Due to the size of the lot and all of it being located within 75* of the OHWL of Lake Minnetonka variances were required to redevelop the subject property. The applicant submitted a variance application September, 2000. After discussions with staff and some rer’.esigning the application was hea.rd at the November 20, 2000 Planning Commission meeting. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the proposed project with hardcover in the 0-75 setback zone to be 2,079 s.f. (26%) and lot coverage by structure not to exceed 1500 s.f. both of which all lie within 75’ of OHWL of Lake Minnetonka. The recon.recnudtion was based on the property was currently developed as a single family residence with 2,328 s.f. of existing hardcover and over 1,500 s.f. of structure. The hardcover and structure Oil tilt lot would decrease w ith redevelopment of the property. The r.p;,!ica ion moved forward to the City Council and was approved at their December 11 20'/0 meeting. The council approved the application and resolution which stated 3 original ’ copic- a rev iseo survey showing the budding plans and all proposed hardcover be submitted Also, the site plan'surv’cy shall be in substantial conformance with the plan attached to the resolution. The surv eys and building plans were submitted for review by the building depamnent. The survev nad been rev.sed and was in substantial conformance with the hardcover and structure approvals granted by the City Council. However, the building plans submitted showed a different ground level deck, a screen porch, and a second level deck. The oiiilding official made W3-2880 Fred Johnson 1926 Fagemess Point Road 4/14/2003 Page 2 of4 i