Laserfiche WebLink
•• .• '• •:Tv‘*J< <br />, •f,.^ .•;•,■ t:;,>*i;* <br />» .* .•, ^v•'tf- ’. <br />« • ••.'••'. '. .'.-J •>;’. <br />r A V** <br />. . .-*-n • ;•'■■' <br />• *. .' <br />. 4, ^ . <br />V.k' •••-**- <br />r t. <br />*.“ '■ V^V’ <br />: • -i " <br />■•tv...;:'. <br />*f'Tr <br />\* • • • .■ >1 .T>r <br />i'y». *-;/* *•••■’ !?•' • .-r.vr}>*- <br />• . ■ :? •' r'. <br />.'i »)V.- • r I ^ . <br />* ^ * 'Ir. ■' <br />■'i i. V-. <br />■ ... '-v''.-,' «' <br />•^‘^v • <br /><*. V <br />V. <br />■.T'J <br />•' V <br />' . 'v . • “•'' a- <br />T * V> <br />K • ■ \ <br />V.s I <br />. •i’T-n <br />VV ‘ j <br />/ •« - ^ <br />S 'i .•*: » <br />• . i <br />‘r/vV.'.i ■« <br />« - ft <br />/ <br />.p-3ly of 0R0.'%'0 <br />w <br />RCSOLUTIO*: OF THE CfTY COUNCIL <br />NO. •. 4 3 <br />- J <br />3) Thcf existing residence st^uccuro is locrted 28* fron the <br />shoreline with c second story dock located 20* fron the <br />shoreline. Existing hardcover cn the property in the 0-75* zone <br />is 30.•*.^ and in the 75-250* zone is 49.01. <br />C) The pr'-pos*:^ 3''diticnai structure includes ccr.pletion of the <br />second story over the entire existing house, with a 3-levol <br />addition brtv;eon the existing house and the garnge, plus a new <br />second story deck at tte northwest end of the house. None of the <br />additions will bo closer to the lake than the existing house and <br />deck. <br />D) The applicant’s original proposal showed a reduction in <br />hardcover in the 0-75* zone from 30.41 to 30.1;, and from 49.01 <br />to 44.41 in the #5-250* zone. The initial Planning Commission <br />review of that proposal resulted in direction from the Planning <br />Commission to further reduce hardcover on the property, hence <br />applicant returned with a proposal for 30.0% in the 0-75* zone <br />and 38.91 in the /5-250* zone. The Planning Commission found <br />this substantial hardcover reduction to be a positive aspect of <br />this application and rocemmended approval. <br />E) Due to the fact that this property has lakeshero on 2 sides, <br />with a relatively small area in the 75 — 250* setback zone, the <br />property has some unique hardships in that it could not support <br />any additions without variances. <br />r) The proposed additions will create no significant visual <br />encroachment of views enjoyed by neighboring property owners, and <br />P*ot bo visually obtrusive ’within the landscape du'' zo <br />the topography within the immediately adjacent ar^.as. <br />City Council has considered this application including the <br />findings and rocenmendations of the Planning Commission, reports by <br />City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect cf the proposed <br />variance cn the health, safety and welfare of the community. <br />5. The city Council finds that the conditions emistinc <br />T r r»i /r. r* * • • .•-.r. .> .. i { ^ ^ : a. • ___. • - . ^property are peuiiar to it and do net apply generally <br />on thir <br />otherproperty in this zoning district; that granting the variance would no** <br />adverroly affect traffic concitiens, light, air ncr pc<e a fire hazard <br />or oth'^r danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a <br />ccnvenicncr^ to the applicant, hut is necessary to alleviate a demon­ <br />strable hardship cr difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial <br />property right of the applicant; and would be in kc'pinc with the <br />Spin*, anu intent of th? Cenino Code and Com::rohensi vo Plan City. ' ‘ . <br />rage 2 cf 5 <br />•i« % <br />( <br />, ^ -• ^% <br />>1 <br />ft* ft #• <br />■aiii I ftfi ■ . . _ . ~ ^ - 1 >1 ^ -II M I______.jtM. ' ft. .. *•* <br />t‘ > <br />r’K <br />I 4 <br />i <br />»-> <br />i? <br />»V <br />^ J