My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-03-2003 Council Work Session
Orono
>
City Council
>
2003
>
04-03-2003 Council Work Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2023 2:49:00 PM
Creation date
1/26/2023 2:47:46 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO NAVARRE TOWN MEETING <br />Thursday, March 13,2003 <br />7:00 o ’clock p.m. <br />William Wolfe, 32SS Crystal Bay Road, asked what was happening with regard to the Dakota Rail <br />Trail project. <br />As a member of the committee which spearheaded the Dakota Line trail, Gabriel Jabbour stated <br />that he, as well as, Peter Johnson of Mound, continue to work on the project daily. He noted that <br />the biggest obstacle continues to be the objections raised by the Minnetonka Beach community. <br />While Hennepin County purchased the line in hope that it could be turned into a trail, they’ve been <br />forced to put the rail out for bid for anyone who could operate a rail service. Hennepin County also <br />approached the Three Rivers Park District about turning the 44 mile stretch into a walk/bike trail. <br />Mr. Jabbour believed this opportimity would be an enormous amenity to the area and create a <br />pedestrian corridor within Navarre, Spring Park, Mound, and Minnetonka Beach that would tic into <br />the Luce Line. <br />The public applauded Mr. Jabbour’s and the City’s efforts. <br />Mr. Wolfe asked if the trail could potentially act as a light rail corridor into Minneapolis. <br />Jabbour stated that the Dakota Rail trail is identified os #17 on the Minneapolis light rail trail plan, <br />which would put this light years into the future. <br />White felt the future development of the trail to be the tic that links the center of all the lake <br />communities together. Other than the Lake Superior Trail, White believed this trail would be <br />second to none. <br />Evon Paige asked if the vae2:,i parcel ne.xt to the liquor store was contaminated or prime real <br />estate. <br />Mike Gaffron stated that remediation of the vacant Keaveny property had occurred 10-15 years <br />ago. He indicated he is not aware of the current status of the property in terms of the remediation <br />or any plans for redevelopment. <br />Ralph Kempf reiterated that, while current business is vital, he would not wish to apply any undue <br />burden upon the local business owners by requiring them to update too much. He stated that, <br />further west, vacancies arc common place and he would not want that to be the case for Navarre. <br />Mr. Kempf agreed that the addition of trees and/or a defining feature would be nice. <br />Moorse asked for any further comments. <br />Tamara Bomar asked if there were any plans which would include adding accommodations to the <br />area. <br />Jabbour pointed out that new accommodations e.xist in Long Lake and that Mound has plans to <br />build a motel as well. <br />Dan Clear cautioned the Council from taking too great an oixmership position in Navarre, one that <br />would discourage others from coming in. He stated that progress w ill happen, and encouraged the <br />public and Council to keep an open mind. He reminded the public that the traffic, however <br />PAGE 5 of 10
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.