Laserfiche WebLink
may not be appropriate; <br />8. Other issues raised by the Planning Commission. <br />Staff Recommendations: <br />If the Planning Commission feels that the applicant should be able to maintain the setbacks <br />permitted from previously approved variances on the property to construct a new house, the <br />application should be approved. <br />However, if the Planning Commission feels that the new house should be built to meet the <br />required side yard setbacks and not set a precedent for future redevelopment in the area, the <br />apj'Iication should be tabled to allow the applicant to present an altered plan. <br />Options for Planning Commission Action: <br />1. Recommend approval of the requested variances. <br />2. Recommend denial, stating reasons. <br />3. Table. <br />4. Other action. <br />M2~2859 Blake and Mary Bichanich <br />332 Westlake Street <br />1/23/2003 <br />Page 3 of 4 <br />» <br />i