Laserfiche WebLink
• ’‘V• . '*•• <br />. TO: •; <br />^ * t ’’ ’' ’• • •FIC.l: <br />-V • <br />• • <br />K. R. Bchscn <br />II. F. ^'Jhich . ' <br />February 27, 1976 <br />.‘-.* <br />Sl^’cCT:David J. Knisbdpf - 1200 Wildhurst Trail <br />Variance - Lot Area and Width <br />■ - a-*: <br />This prcpexty is located in an LR-IB residential zone. Mr. Kmslccpf is ,• •.•'■?• 7, <br />a variance frcn lot area and width requirenents of caa acre,: j ■..-» «•,• <br />ft.) crd 140 ft. lot width. His lot consists of .7 of an acre <br />t. *dde therefore, he is requesting variances of 13,068 sq. ft- •:-i' <br />\ ...'V-\ <br />• •f • ;V • Th« proposed location does nset all sctbach requireiwnts. However, ws do <br />• have a problem in the existing location of the residence on the property <br />V • ‘ ‘ *■— *■---------------------------------------------'—"---------------*--•«*--------------•*■*-'* — -v-,14 <br />:C.,V :■ SS'Si .S <br />cncipcdiing <br />- ■■■ •. •' the pToperti <br />to tiis south. We have here a nen-con forming situation which we ^<wd <br />Tsetify. - At the time that the neighboring residence t«as constructed surveys <br />ot required with building permit applications. This house is new <br />_ _ _diing the property line to such a degree that it does not even meet <br />the DiniBxaa State requirements. We night suggest as an agreement between <br />the property owners, to change the lot lines scnvwhat so we can. resolve <br />We could also consider, slight variances cn the side . . <br />- ;• <br />i •• <br />' V • • • SCJC3 of the prdbl^. Ke co <br />V V-. • setback to the north. ' <br />'V Ve«Shciild try' to meet the 20 ft. distances between structures and also <br />V ^ - • prevent future problems from any fences that might be erected aider another <br />property owners windows.V;., >'•« k- i-.i ; <br />'V?A ■PLAJWINR CmnSSION - MarA 1, 1976 <br />v.;"‘ <br />T * ,• * <br />'•py^ <br />..'A.yr.'t' <br />f t hV <br />N <br />». •.* •*>V <br />‘I * • <br />Although not scheduled as part of the regular meeting, the Cermissien <br />revieved iJie above application. They then directed that I ccntact <br />Mr. Krushopf and state that the Planning Conmlssion would locic favorable <br />to a v-^riance if he by pri\’ate nsgiotations try to realign the lot lino <br />idth hiS neighbor in order to alleviate the cne foot setback prcblcn. <br />CC^-ESS20?I - r.2rc:i 15, 1978 <br />!*• 'l;*^**f*’ • • <br />• v'4 *.* .'l<r <br />?Cr, Srnjkzipf c:d Iiia roi.'^ibcr, o3ry Walsh, epponxed acd pxecented a et ? <br />cl:r; a rrrlctd that r.tuld siva I-Jr, t;ol&i 10 fest ci tho oids yard <br />1 I <br />Hn c;;i:a':tiCT. Kc^rrrar, Kr, Krvit!ctpf rtuld hsvt to alto* his huildins plai <br />by £rI;iT!3 a slisJit rctiticn o-f heuso cn the lot. <br />• •• '{• •/ ,** V I <br />■•.V.' <• .. _ • <br />• 'V • * <br />T'.a Cntbsicn rr:oirnr::>dr:d cjroTtrai of plan end the '/arioacss ccnsistlng <br />c5 fO -it. Cl Itrt •atUlh; .3 olfd csro cn let croo zrA a 6” varianoo cn &e <br />ri-fe cn lot lino. <br />CarCTiL ?II3rET3 - rari*. 22, 1570 <br />• • •• • <br />.4 I <br />4 <br />T/n CrtT. ►i’ egrrevtd tho variance end lot line toarrar-iciOTt cs praseated <br />•IrVtVrTAicrd plcn. <br />• r.• « <br />n <br />i ’