Laserfiche WebLink
r; <br />#1 <br />While out to the pro^y for an insulation and roof inspecUon, the building inspector noticed th, <br />lids by «vierng tS p^oSbS?dta^^if,l^i3s^ ‘T^amT'*^ <br />City staff and the n«'v «ch»ect an^ builder di«ussed the problen, with the eaves and a proposed <br />attached garage. Another set of plans were submitted for the proposed attached gar«e TOe <br />praposed garage met the required 10’ setback. The garage wi dSgned to fX?^ setock <br />for placement of the^ge, it was detent <br />the foundation of the new residence encroached into the side yard setback (9 6 -9 8’) <br />Plans: <br />tai«i» ajS '“-y showed the <br />#r 'flu- *0 »«och«l garage show the eaves larger than on set <br />?fi, il M* “'1'°'*^ •*'" construction wS^ruT^frbX^^^^^ <br />Foundation: <br />In the LR-IB zoning district, the required side yard setback i« in* The. k..;i,4- <br />Eaves: <br />‘ '» ‘""oach no more than I ■/,• i, <br />"-.'■i-- HorverXTves foJCoSshow 30" because that plan is “as built". Also bec^ ih. 'r“..T™ »“ « <br />the eaves are 30". they encroach 36" into the side >ard setback. (&e Exhibit C)“ <br />Lot Line Rearrangement: <br />The lot line between •'•4and 1200 Wildhurst Trail is oddly shaped due to a lot line <br />rearrangement. In 1976 the property to the north, 1200 W ildhursrTrail, received approval for a <br />m-2V\ Daa'Sally Weatherly <br />1214 Wildhurst Trail <br />2.14/2003 <br />Page 2 of3 <br />It rtiliMfo-liallilliii