My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-24-2003 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2003
>
02-24-2003 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2023 2:35:17 PM
Creation date
1/26/2023 2:25:07 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
246
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MONDAY, FEBRUARY 10,2003 <br />*7. #02-2861 Erik Thompson, 1940 Concordia Street—Variances—Resolution <br />No. 4926—Continued <br />where 30* is required in the LR-IC zooning district and to permit 2,840 s.f. (17.9%) <br />of structural lot coverage where 2371 s.f. (15%) is allowed. <br />Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />*8. 1(02-2862 Steven Gronwall, 1586 Long Lake Boulevard—Variances —Resolution <br />No. 4927 <br />Murphy moved, and Sansevere seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 4927 a variance to <br />Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.23, Subdivbion 6(B) to allow construction of a <br />new attached garage with a second story to the existing house to be 4.5* from the rear <br />lot line where 50* is required, 14* from the side yard adjacent street lot line where <br />50* is required in the LR-1A zoning district and to allow 2,313 s.f. (3534%) <br />hardcover in the 250-500* setback zone where 1,963.5 s.f. (30%) is allowed. <br />Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />9. #02-2863 Richard Kail, 3753 Casco Avenue—Variances <br />White stated he remov ed it from the Consent Agenda because he wondered if the house <br />could be moved further -;ilh to reduce structural coverage. <br />Bottenberg .«5tated that it could not. Structural coverage is a total site figure, so he’d be <br />over the allowed coverage no matter where the house is positioned on the lot. <br />White stated that the lot was the worst one on Casco Point. He stated there are City- <br />owned lots adjacent to the Kail’s that are used for dumping garbage. White suggested <br />allowing the Kail’s to buy one of the lots and clean it up, increasing their lot size to allow <br />a larger structure on the site. He also stated that the alley next to the lot would never be <br />used as a road, but the Kail’s couldn’t count it in their lot size, giving them a <br />disadvantage. <br />Kail stated that he could not reduce the size of his house without totally redesigning it. <br />The alley is his only hardship. <br />Mayor Peterson stated that he has a substandard lot with a larger house. Kail responded <br />that his house is 1,999 s.f. without the garage. The garage brings the house to 2,856 s.f <br />Murphy stated that the best solution would be to sell him the adjacent lot to the south. <br />Bottenberg stated that the Planning Commission discussed the alley, and decided that the <br />City would not be likely to vacate it. Barrett added that Kail therefore requires a variance.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.