My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-10-2003 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2003
>
02-10-2003 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2023 2:08:30 PM
Creation date
1/26/2023 1:58:33 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
204
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
w <br />«» <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MONDAY, JANUARY 13,2003 <br />3. Appeal of Narrows Saloon Liquor Isolation Penalty Fee—Continued <br />Burrolt staled that Council could waive the fine, but should get a written agreement from <br />Anderst stating that he understands the offense would remain and a second violation would <br />carry the apptuptiutc penalty. lie stated that because Anderst was not present at the time, <br />his testimony is hearsay, and the waitress pleaded guilty to the charge. <br />Murphy stated that because the waitress failed to curd the officer, there was a violation of <br />the law. She paid her $400 fine. He asked where the bar's responsibility came into it. <br />Anderst slated that he has spent more than $500 to insure against such incidents. <br />Mayor Peterson stated the bottom line is that she didn’t card the officer. <br />Anderst stated the report claimed the bartender served the drink at the bar, which is untrue. <br />He stated the waitress is a college student who preferred the fine and probation to fighting <br />the charge in court. I Ic staled he only wanted the fine against the bar c.xcused. He <br />admitted it happened and understood that the second offense would carry a stiff penally. <br />Barrett stated the City should prepare a document to be signed by Anderst stating that he <br />admitted to the violation and understood the consequence of a second violation. He asked <br />what precedent waiving the fine would set. <br />Murphy asked if Anderst would share the refunded fee with his waitress. He replied he <br />would not, because it was her mistake. <br />Moorsc a.sked if the Narrows staff had attended Orono Police workshops before the <br />incident. Anderst replied many of his staff had. but the waitress in question had not. He <br />was not sure if she had attended one since. <br />While slated he supports the City ’s program and the fines. He asked if the City could hold <br />his check for 6 months, and if there are no violations within that period, return the $500 fee <br />then, but if there is another violation, then the $500 check would be cashed and the line for <br />the second offense would be implemented. <br />Sansevere stated that would set a preeeilent that bars could avoid paying fees on first <br />o flenses. <br />Mayor Peterson stated that she received a call from Stephanie Grand asking that the City <br />not let Ander.st go without paying the fine. Anderst stated he had 3 of her bad checks. <br />Murj)hy slated that he has been sober for 20 years and had mixed feelings about the issue. <br />He staled he would vote in favor of it, but wanted Anderst to be a complete advocate for <br />the City ’s eflbri.s to prevent underage and over-drinking. <br />t
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.