My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-27-2003 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2003
>
01-27-2003 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2023 1:59:13 PM
Creation date
1/26/2023 1:41:37 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
392
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
I <br />Request for Council Action continued <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />January 27, 2003 <br />North Long Lake East Sewer Extension <br />was SCI at $19,000 in 1997. Sewer connection fees arc adjusted for inflation on an annual basis <br />resulting in 2003 connection fee of $22,085 for the North Long Lake project. These connection fees <br />are normal ly charged for properties within the project area that connect to sewer at a later date. <br />The property owner for 1405 Sixth Avenue North, which is located adjacent to the North Long Lake <br />sewer project, has sent a letter to the City requesting sewer. The property owner is remodeling and <br />enlarging the house which requires replacing the existing noncon forming septic system or connecting <br />to sewer. <br />Sewer installation for this new neighborhood will be via a connection to the existing North Long <br />Lake sewer system. In initial discussions with the property owner, he was told that getting sewer <br />would require payment of the current connection fee of $22,085.00 plus the costs to extend a <br />pressure sewer from the end of the existing sewer to his property which is a distance of about 200 <br />feet. <br />The property owner, John Crottcau, raised concerns about the fairness of paying the $22,085 <br />connection fee plus the costs for extending sewer to his property based on the fact this fee is <br />normally used for properties within the project area that have a sewer across or along the street in <br />front of the property. He submitted a letter requesting that the connection fee be credited the amount <br />it co.sts to extend a sewer connection stub to the property in a reasonable location for hookup as if <br />the property was in the sewer project area. <br />Another issue for consideration is that the North Long Sewer connection fee was for gravity sewer <br />service to the property, and his property will be served by a pressure sewer system. This reduces the <br />value of the sewer because the property owner is responsible for the purchase, installation and <br />maintenance of his own grinder pump station. Our staff opinion is that Mr. Crottcau raises a <br />legitimate issue in his letter that merits consideration by the City. Consideration to the property <br />owners comments are addressed in the next section. <br />East North Long l.akc Sewer Project - Phase I <br />1 he 2000 MUSA expansion area, south of County Road 6, along the northeastern shore of Long <br />Lake contains 10 homes between the east end of the existing North Long Lake sewer and East Long <br />Lake Road. This area can logically be divided into two separate areas for possible sewer projects <br />as there is a distance of 1,000 feet and a creek and a large wetland separating the areas labeled A and <br />D on the attached aerial photograph. Sewer would have to be extended across area A before Area B <br />could obtain sewer, but Area B should logically be considered a separate project with its own project <br />cost and unit assessments or connection fees.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.