My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-27-2003 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
01-27-2003 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2023 1:59:13 PM
Creation date
1/26/2023 1:41:37 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
392
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
#02-2753,2817 Casco Point Road <br />January IS, 2003 <br />Page 2 <br />wall with substandard setback, the applicant is hiring a structural engineer to review the situation and <br />we anticipated having his analysis available for your January 22 meeting. <br />Replacement of the removed second story in the substandard setback clearly requires a variance that <br />was not addressed in the original approval. Furthermore, per the approval resolution conditions, the <br />removal of portions of the existing house and the n<*ed for substantial work on the foundation, <br />triggers the need for further City review. The underlying issue is whether the remodeling^addition <br />process has resulted in removal of so much of the existing residence that the project should be <br />considered as a total rebuild, requiring all setbacks to be met. <br />Please review the original staff memo and minutes from the February 19, 2002 Planning <br />Commission meeting. <br />Staff Recommendation <br />Staff has allowed the applicant to continue work only on those portions of the house and additions <br />that are structurally unrelated to the encroaching portions of the existing house. The primary issues <br />that need further City review are: <br />1.Whether a variance will now be granted to allow the second story encroachment to be <br />replaced at the 6' setback; <br />2.Whether the first story encroachment should be allowed to continue at the 6’ setback, <br />assuming that its foundation needs to be repaired or replaced. <br />Staff is treating this as a re-opening of the previous variance approval application. In order to <br />expedite the review process, at staffs request Council has referred this back to the Planning <br />Commission for consideration at your January 22 meeting, with the intent to have this back on <br />Council ’s January 27 agenda to consider the PC recommendation and take final action. The <br />neighboring property owners have been notified by mail that this application is being further <br />reviewed should they wish to comment.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.