Laserfiche WebLink
H <br />^^NUTES OF THE <br />ORONO ^LAN^fING CO>I>nSSION MEETING <br />Monday, November 18,2002 <br />6:30 o’clock p.m. <br />views of the lake and should be removed also. Mr. Delay felt the deck over the garage ^as <br />done w£ll, but voiced concern over the steep grade created by the proposed boulder wall. <br />As a parent, he felt this could be hazardous. <br />Chair Smith asked the applicant, once again, if he would rather the Commission table or <br />vote on the application. <br />Manley asked for a vote. <br />Hawn moved, Frltzler seconded, to deny Application #02-2854, Ke' !!: Manley, <br />•• <br />application to increase hardcover and put hardcover in the 0-75’ setback to construct <br />a combination boulder wall and riprap system for the purpose of containing the <br />bank. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. <br />(#11) REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVES <br />ATTENDING COUNCIL MEETINGS OF OCTOBER 28, 2002 AND NOVEMBER <br />12,2002 <br />October 28 - Fritzlcr reported that the Hope Chest for Breast Cancer application was <br />approved. As of the October 28 meeting the Professional Properties of Orono wetland <br />delineation issue was unresolved. <br />November 12, 2002 Chair Smith and Gaf&on reported that the MCWD had ruled tot the <br />wetland on the proposed Professional Properties of Orono site was an incidental wetland <br />and did not require additional mitigation. <br />Council liaison Murphy reported that Council representatives had approached MnDOT <br />about the construction of the trail within their right-of-way casement. Although the City <br />feels this to be the best location, MnDOT has its reservations, however, agreed in principal <br />that if the highway were returned to the County, they would likely support this location. <br />Murphy indicated that the City would still require easements from the applicants as a back <br />PAGE 35 of28