My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-27-2003 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2003
>
01-27-2003 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2023 1:59:13 PM
Creation date
1/26/2023 1:41:37 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
392
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
p*------- <br />8^ <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, November It, 2002 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />for roof line expansion was granted; whereas variances for greater than 25% hardcover in <br />the 75-250’ setback and greate*’ than 15% lot coverage for a tunnel deck were denied. <br />Gaf&on pointed out that there are a number of unresolved issues related to this property <br />which he enumerated as follows: <br />1) 8X8 Shed illegally constructed/located near the east side of the road, within 2’ of <br />shoreline <br />2) Gravel parking area (20’X32*approx.) constructed within 75 ’ of shoreline along east <br />side of road, without City approvals and constituting illegal hardcover. No evidence on <br />file suggests this was formerly a parking area, photos suggest a minimal single grassy <br />paridng space at best <br />3) 2002 Surveys show property located on the east side of Fagemess Point Road, which <br />consists of “accretions”. Manley is intending to claim the areas surveyed east of the road <br />via a land title registration (torrens) process. Although stafTs understanding is that the <br />neighbors to the immediate north will be disputing this claim. <br />4) Concrete stairway alongside garage is constructed within the road right-of-way, and <br />may be hazardous for road maintenance <br />5) Deck (approx. 5X10) constructed on the west side of the house without zoning approval, <br />constituting 0-75’ structure encroachment and excessive hardcover. Deck was not shown <br />on plans or surveys used in approvals for prior zoning applications. Deck first appeared oh <br />a plan used to obtain a permit for basement remodel and deck over garage in February <br />2002, however, was not park of that plan review. <br />Staff maintains that this deck exists illegally and should be removed. Although a 160 s.f <br />deck existed in the past, it was completely removed prior to or during the remodeling <br />PAGE 20 of 28
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.