My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-27-2003 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
01-27-2003 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2023 1:59:13 PM
Creation date
1/26/2023 1:41:37 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
392
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MONDAY, JANUARY 13,2003 <br />3. Appeal of Narrows Saloon Liquor Violation Penally Fee—Continued <br />Barrett stated that Council could waive the fine, but should get a uTitten agreement from <br />Anderst stating that he understands the offense would remain and a second violation would <br />carry the appropriate penalty. He stated that because Anderst was not present at the time, <br />his testimony is hearsay, and the waitress pleaded guilty to the charge. <br />Murphy stated that because the waitress failed to card the officer, there was a violation of <br />the law. She paid her $400 fine. He asked where the bar's responsibility came into it. <br />Anderst stated that he has spent more than $500 to insure against such incidents. <br />Mayor Peterson stated the bottom line is that she didn't card the officer. <br />Anderst stated the report claimed the bartender scrN C I the drink at the bar, which is untrue. <br />He stated the waitress is a college student who preferred the fine and probation to fighting <br />the charge in court. He stated he only wanted the fine against the bar excused. He <br />admitted it happened and understood that the second offense would carry a stiff penalty. <br />Barrett stated the City should prepare a document to be signed by Anderst stating that he <br />admitted to the violation and understood the consequence of a second violation. He asked <br />what precedent waiving the fine would set. <br />Murphy asked if Anderst would share the refunded fee with his waitress. He replied he <br />would not, because it was her mistake. <br />Moorsc asked if the Narrows staff had attended Orono Police w orkshops before the <br />incident. Anderst replied many of his staff had, but the waitress in question had not. He <br />was not sure if she had attended one since. <br />White stated he supports the City's program and the fines. He asked if the City could hold <br />his check for 6 months, and if there are no violations within that period, return the $500 fee <br />then, but if there is another violation, then the $500 check would be cashed and the fine for <br />the second offense would be implemented. <br />Sansevere stated that would set a precedent that bars could avoid paying fees on first <br />offenses. <br />Mayor Peterson stated that she received a call from Stephanie Grand asking that the City <br />not let Anderst go w ithout paying the fine. Anderst stated he had 3 of her bad checks. <br />Murphy stated that he has been sober for 20 years and had mixed feelings about the issue. <br />He stated he w ould vote in favor of it, but wanted Anderst to be a complete advocate for <br />the City's efforts to prevent underage and over-drinking. <br />miiii iini
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.