My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-13-2003 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
01-13-2003 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2023 1:47:48 PM
Creation date
1/26/2023 1:38:42 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
172
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MONDAY, DECEMBER 9,2002 <br />9. U02-2854 Kevin Manley, 1973 Fagerness Point Road—Vartance/Conditionai Use <br />Permit—Continued <br />the Manley’s own the accretions. The City’s concern is with where the property boundary <br />will end up. The actual area Manley owns within the east 0-75 ’ lakeshore yard was at that <br />time unknown. <br />Regarding the concrete stairs alongside the garage. GafTron stated that they extended into <br />the road right-of-way, but the City had never received a complaint about them. He stated <br />he would defer to publie works coneeming any issue with the stairs. Murphy stated that if <br />staff felt the stairs were a problem, then Manley should correct them. Sanseverc suggested <br />Gappa look at the steps and determine if they would be a problem for the plows. <br />Concerning the deck on the west side of the house, constructed without zoning approval, <br />Gaffron staled that there had been a deck there that was tom off and replaced with a new- <br />one. There had been one building plan for the basement remodel that showed the deek, but <br />it was never approved. The deck is within the 0-75 ’ zone. Mayor Peterson stated the deck <br />had to go through due process. White stated the City had to be consistent to meet State <br />law. Manley showed Council a site copy of the plan with a City stamp on it that showed <br />the deck both bef jre and after the reeonstruction. He stated that they had reduced the deck <br />size and amount of hardcover. <br />Majror Peterson stated that the grade of the walkout level and undereutting of the lakeshore <br />bank issues would be tabled, along with the proposed boulder wall landscaping plans. <br />Murphy asked if tabling it would keep the applicant and his neighbors from installing the <br />riprap. Gaffron stated that if they received a Watershed District permit, and it wouldn’t <br />affect the rest of the property, then Manley could proceed w ith the riprap. <br />Murphy asked if there was an advantage to doing it with the lake frozen over. Manley <br />stated it would probably be a spring project, done with a backhoe. <br />Barrett suggested they direct the applicant back to the Planning Commission with no <br />motion needed. <br />Gaffron stated they had the ability to extend the deadline to March 12,2003. If Manley <br />submits the new variance applications by December 18.2002, he could be finished in <br />March of 2003. <br />l^lurphy moved, and Sansevere seconded, to remand the appikation for conditional <br />use permit and variance for land alteration and hardcover within 75’ of the shoreline <br />back to the Planning Commission. <br />Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />8
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.