My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-20-2004 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2004
>
09-20-2004 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2023 1:30:21 PM
Creation date
1/26/2023 1:27:12 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
219
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MEMORANDUM <br />To: Ron Moorse <br />\ <br />From: Mike Gaffroi:. Planning Director ‘ <br />Date: July 7, 20C4 <br />Subject: «04-30243 Large Vehicle Storage Zoning Antendmcnl <br />On June 25 Council tabled the Laigc Vehicle Stoi agc eiv.ev.dir.cnt to allow staff additional t.ine ta <br />ir.vestigaie alternatives <br />Under the City ordinanecs existing pr.oi to Dcceiv.hcr 2003. r.aff ;nte.'pie»*d the code to mean that one <br />large vclucic was allowed to be stored ou’side on apiopeity\.ith fewrcstnctions. Under the cuirent code <br />adopted in December 2003, the ability to have a large vehicle stored on a propertyis not a guaranteed <br />rigb.t.nor IS it an 'existing use* that can be "grandfathered" or recognized as a legal non-confcnning use <br />The new ordinance established pcrfonna.KC standavds for storage oflarge vehicles, and to date tltat <br />ordinance docs not contain any language that allows pre-existing storage simations to contuv.ie in a manner <br />that is not conforming While * grandfathering’ provisions could be added to the code, staff is generally <br />againrt such, an action because it requires inv cntoiymg and lecoidkeeping, and docs not solv c p: e-existmg <br />problem situations which the new perfonnance standards were attempting to resolve <br />Thci z may be a small variety of options fer allowing large vch.clcs to be stored unde: cen J.itc:t5 that do <br />not meet the currently cst.'iblislrcd perfoniunc e standards E.xch opfor lias pro's and con’s Tire sc opt.uis <br />may include. <br />1) revising the perfonnance standards, or <br />2) granting of a variance to a peifonr.ance standard where the Council f.nds that an "undue <br />hardship" is ptcser.t, or <br />3) establishing higc vehicle storage as a conditional use with required pciformance standaids, it <br />ccu’dbe wntten st.ch that the perfonnance standards might be relaxed if the negative impacts <br />of such relaxation can be mitigated or are found to be minimal or inconsequential <br />o To date, Council has not revised the performance standards, as there has not been a majonty of <br />Coancilmembers who believe the code should be changed. <br />c With regards to vanar.ces, the Council may allow a property to be used in a m.anner othenvise <br />prohibited by the ordinance by varying one or more of the performance standards of the ordinance, <br />if *ihe Council determines t’nat the lest of "undue hardship” has been met. The statutory dcfiniticn of <br />Undue Hardsltip is: **Undue hardship"... means the property in question cannot be put to a <br />reasonable use if used under the conditions allowed by the official controls, the plight of the
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.