Laserfiche WebLink
MEMORANDUM <br />To: Ron Moorse <br />\ <br />From: Mike Gaffroi:. Planning Director ‘ <br />Date: July 7, 20C4 <br />Subject: «04-30243 Large Vehicle Storage Zoning Antendmcnl <br />On June 25 Council tabled the Laigc Vehicle Stoi agc eiv.ev.dir.cnt to allow staff additional t.ine ta <br />ir.vestigaie alternatives <br />Under the City ordinanecs existing pr.oi to Dcceiv.hcr 2003. r.aff ;nte.'pie»*d the code to mean that one <br />large vclucic was allowed to be stored ou’side on apiopeity\.ith fewrcstnctions. Under the cuirent code <br />adopted in December 2003, the ability to have a large vehicle stored on a propertyis not a guaranteed <br />rigb.t.nor IS it an 'existing use* that can be "grandfathered" or recognized as a legal non-confcnning use <br />The new ordinance established pcrfonna.KC standavds for storage oflarge vehicles, and to date tltat <br />ordinance docs not contain any language that allows pre-existing storage simations to contuv.ie in a manner <br />that is not conforming While * grandfathering’ provisions could be added to the code, staff is generally <br />againrt such, an action because it requires inv cntoiymg and lecoidkeeping, and docs not solv c p: e-existmg <br />problem situations which the new perfonnance standards were attempting to resolve <br />Thci z may be a small variety of options fer allowing large vch.clcs to be stored unde: cen J.itc:t5 that do <br />not meet the currently cst.'iblislrcd perfoniunc e standards E.xch opfor lias pro's and con’s Tire sc opt.uis <br />may include. <br />1) revising the perfonnance standards, or <br />2) granting of a variance to a peifonr.ance standard where the Council f.nds that an "undue <br />hardship" is ptcser.t, or <br />3) establishing higc vehicle storage as a conditional use with required pciformance standaids, it <br />ccu’dbe wntten st.ch that the perfonnance standards might be relaxed if the negative impacts <br />of such relaxation can be mitigated or are found to be minimal or inconsequential <br />o To date, Council has not revised the performance standards, as there has not been a majonty of <br />Coancilmembers who believe the code should be changed. <br />c With regards to vanar.ces, the Council may allow a property to be used in a m.anner othenvise <br />prohibited by the ordinance by varying one or more of the performance standards of the ordinance, <br />if *ihe Council determines t’nat the lest of "undue hardship” has been met. The statutory dcfiniticn of <br />Undue Hardsltip is: **Undue hardship"... means the property in question cannot be put to a <br />reasonable use if used under the conditions allowed by the official controls, the plight of the