My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-20-2004 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2004
>
09-20-2004 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2023 1:30:21 PM
Creation date
1/26/2023 1:27:12 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
219
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
L <br />rae>4of4 <br />Sec. 78-766. Area, height, lot width, setback requiieinent and design requirements. <br />(i) Height. No structure or building shall exceed 2V, stories ef and shall not <br />exceed 30 feet in height except as provided in section 78-1366. <br />Sec. 78-797. Area, height, lot width setback requirements and design requirements. <br />(7) No structure or building shall exceed 2'A stories or and shall not exceed 30 <br />feet in height except as provided in section 78*1366. <br />Sec. 78*825. Area, height, setback and design requirements. <br />(d) Height. No structure or building shall exceed three stories or and shall not <br />exceed 40 feet in height except as provided in section 78*1366. <br />issnet for CoasidcrathNi <br />1. Does the Planning Commission have any issues with the proposed amendments and <br />their impacts on development? <br />2. b the Planning commission interested in establishing a peak height maximum of 40 <br />feet, to be included in a future amendment? <br />3. Ate there any other issues or concerns with thb application? <br />SUIT RccomBMndation <br />Recommend the City Council adopt the proposed amendments to Sections 78*1, 230 (a). <br />255 (a), 305 (a). 330 (a). 350 (a), 370 (a). 395 (a). 420 (a), 44 (a), 502, 5V 646 (i). 672 <br />(a), 707 (n), 736 (i). 766 (i), 797 (7), 825 (d) to clarify for the public how budding he ghi <br />b determined. <br />Staff would also recommend that the Planiting Commission continue to discuss the <br />building height issue at work sessions in an attempt to possibly adopt a maximum peak <br />height as well as additional height restrictions on substandard width lots.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.