Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />i <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO FLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Moaday, Aagast 16,2004 <br />6:00 o'clock p.m. <br />(404-3046 Robcn aod Brcoda MacDouM, <br />Leslie questioned if it was assumed that the applicant was not interested in reducing hardcover and it <br />was also assumed that this garage had collapsed or had detenorated to the point where it needed to be <br />destroyed, Leslie inquired whether that would have been a valid remedy. Leslie inquired whether <br />anotliCT alternative remedy if the applicant docs not wish to reduce har^over elsewhere would be to <br />remove the garage. <br />Kelley stated if the Planning Commission w ould like to discuss the hardcover, he would suggest <br />tabling It until the next meeting to give him an opportunity to speak w ith city suff and his client. <br />Bremer stated the applicant could also relocate the garage. <br />Fnt7ler inquired when the existing garage was removed, whether the electrical service in the walls was <br />removed. <br />MacDonald indicated the new garage has the same electrical panel and the same w inng. <br />Fntzler inquired whether new wiring exists in the walls or the old wiring and whether the old tight <br />switches and outlets were replaced. <br />MacDonald stated the old panel was utilized in the new garage and probably the w ire running to the <br />garage is still there. MacDonald stated he is unsure about the switches. <br />Fritzler suggested the applicant check the panel to see if there is a sticker in there for the new <br />clcctncal to show that it has been inspected. Fntzler commented in his view the new winng points to <br />a rebuild rather than a remodel, and that in his opimon this is a tear-dowm and a rebuild. <br />MacDonald inquired what would happen if the garage were relocated so it no longer encroached. <br />Bremer stated in her view a hardcover analysis would still be done. <br />Kahn stated if a foot and a half were cut off the garage, a vanance w'ould no longer be required. <br />Gundlach indicated typically in new construction where there is excessive hardcover, the City requires <br />the property owner to remov e hardcover in the amount of w hat they are adding. Gundlach noted this <br />garage was rebuilt over c.\isting hardcover and that the City, in cases where the hardcover is well over <br />the amount allowed, have required additional hardcover to be removed. <br />Rahn concurred it may be a good idea to table this application to give the applicant some time to <br />consider his options for reducing hardcover on the lot. <br />Bremer stated she would prefer a target number be given to the applicant. <br />Gundlach indicated the origirtal request was for the 30 percent hardcover to continue w ith a bigger <br />PAGE 23