My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-20-2004 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2004
>
09-20-2004 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2023 1:30:21 PM
Creation date
1/26/2023 1:27:12 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
219
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, Aagnst 16,2(MM <br />6:00 o’clock p.in. <br />(N04-3046 Robert and Brenda Zoe MacDonald, conHaacd) <br />Gundlach noted there are photographs depicting the old garage and the new garage in the packets <br />before the Planning Comn.tssion tonight. <br />Kelley distributed some newer pictures of the cxisung structure to the Planning Commission. <br />Kelley staled it is hts understanding that Commissioners Jurgens and Leslie have slewed the structure. <br />Kelley pomted out that only one comer of the strucnire u encrtsaching and the adjacent property <br />located behind the garage is heavily wooded and cannot view this structure. <br />There were no public comments regarding this plication. <br />Rahn noted he also has \newed the property. Rahn inquired whether the roof has also been nude <br />uller. <br />MacDonald staled he belieses the height of the roof is exactly the same but that the pitch has been <br />changed to a sleeper pilch. <br />Gundlach commented the steeper pilch could have increased the height of the roof but that City Staff <br />does not haw any building plans to confirm that. <br />Rahn stated in his view the roof docs appear to be a little bit toller. Rahn inquired w hether the new <br />garage is wider than it is deep <br />Gundlach stated the dimensions haw remained the same. Gundlach stated in her opinion w hen the <br />roof w’as turned, the pitch was made steeper in order to allow the dormers on the front of the structure. <br />Jurgens stated there is some attic space in the garage but the only access to it is a small trapdoor. <br />Rahn inquired w hetha new studs, sheathing and stucco were utilized to construct the new w alls. <br />Kelley stated the old garage was damaged from water so the walls were replaced as well as the slab. <br />Kelley indicated all the mechanical features of the old garage were incorporated into the new garage, <br />such as the spnnkler system, electrical panel, and heating systent <br />Rahn inquired whether the applicant replaced the slab, the walls, and the roof <br />Kelley stated the> poured oxer the existing slab. <br />MacDonald stated the existing slab was raised because of flooding in the garage. MacDonald <br />indicated every spring they would experience tw o to three inches of w ater in the garage. <br />Rahn inquired why the applicant ’s contractor did not apply for a permit given the amount of <br />construction being done. <br />PAGE It
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.