My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-20-2004 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2004
>
09-20-2004 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2023 1:30:21 PM
Creation date
1/26/2023 1:27:12 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
219
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
P’ <br />5n>XTESOFTHE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, Aapist 16,2004 <br />6:00 o'clock p.m. <br />(M04-3010 Hicodorr Capra, coofinucd) <br />icducc hardcover. The applicant has <»ubmincd a number of plans that have included both an atuched <br />garage and a detached garage as well as relocating the residence closer to the road but has been unable <br />to reduce the proposed hardcover to 25 percent. <br />The Planning Commission reviewed an overhead of the proposed footprint (iundlach indicated the <br />applicant is proposing to construct a tw o and a half stor>' residence consisting of a house footpjint of <br />2288 square feet wnth an attached 720 square feet three-car garage and w iih the proposed hardcover 7t <br />30 percent. Gundlach noted the amount of proposed hardcover has been reduced slightly from the <br />previous plan. Gundlach stated the revised plan has the same basic footpnnt, smaller deck, smaller <br />garage, and no porch. The existing detached garage located by the road and the shed w ill be removed <br />as part of the construction <br />Capra noted at the last Planning Commission meeting he had indicated in his opinion the small road <br />at the back of his property w as a hardship. Capra indicated the road w as in existence at the time he <br />purchased the property. Capra stated he has met all of the City’s requirements except for the <br />hardcosxr and that in his opinion being required to reduce the sue of the house is penalizing him. <br />Capra indicated he has revised his plans to the point where the proposed lesidence is not wlial he <br />would like to construct. Capra indicated he understands the need to limit hardcov er along the lake in <br />an elTort to reduce runoff, but he is unable to reduce the amount of hardcover being proposed. <br />Capra pointed out the property at 1740 Shadywood Road was allowed 38 or 39 percent hardcover, and <br />requested the Planning Commission reconsider his application. Capra suggested the City consider <br />increasing the amount of hardcover allow ed w ithin the City to 30 percent. <br />There were no public comments regarding this application. <br />Rahn stated he understands how the applicant feels. <br />Capra suted he does not feel the proposed residence is out of line for that lot and that the lot would be <br />improved with the new construction. <br />Bremer sUted to her recollection the lot located on Shad>-wood is a very narrow lot. <br />Capra noted the lot is 82 feet. Capra stated that property owner was al.so aware of the road but >et the <br />Planning Commission determined a hardship existed. <br />Gundlach indicated that the property the applicant is referring to had over half of its acreage located ill <br />the 0-75* zone, which was the pnmary basis for granting the variance. <br />Capra indicated he is aware that he is not comparing apples to apples. <br />Bremer commented there are many examples where the Planning Commission has required applicants <br />to reduce the amount of hardcover to 25 pacent on lots that are similar to Mr. Capra's. Bremer <br />indicated the City Council is the Pinal authority. <br />PAGE 4
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.