My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-20-2004 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
09-20-2004 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2023 1:30:21 PM
Creation date
1/26/2023 1:27:12 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
219
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
NOW, THERFFORE BE IT RESOLVED by ihc City Council of <br />Orono. Minnesota: <br />1. <br />2. <br />3. <br />FINDINGS <br />This application was reviewed as Zoning File #03-2936. <br />The property is located in the LR - 1C zoning district, which requires a <br />minimum lot area of '/j acre and a minimum lot width of lOU feet. The <br />applicants’ property is .49 acres and has a width of 60 feet. <br />The Planning Commission reviewed this application at a public hearing <br />held on August 18, 2003. The City Council reviewed the application at <br />regularly scheduled meetings held on September 8 and September 22. <br />2003 and granted conceptual approval of the hardcover variance for the 0- <br />75' zone based on the following findings: <br />a. The nature of the property in the 0-75 ’ zone is steep slopes being <br />supported by retaining walls. <br />b. Currently, the e.xisting lakeshore deck is bolted to a concrete retaining <br />wall which is supporting 8’ of earth. <br />c. After engineering reviews, the interdependency of the wall on the deck <br />is inconclusive; however. Council action to require removal of the <br />deck may have unintended negative consequences. Should the deck be <br />required to be removed and detached from the retaiiting wall, there is <br />the potential tlut the retaining wall may fail, subsequently causing <br />slope failure. <br />The existing conditions of the retaining wall and attached deck support <br />the slope. <br />e. Absent the unique conditions noted above, the lakeshore deck would <br />normally not be allow'ed to remain, as it is a nonconforming structure <br />and the property is undergoing a complete teardown/'rebuild of the <br />principal structure. <br />Page 2 of 6 <br />ii
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.