Laserfiche WebLink
EXHinrrj <br />COMMENT ON APPUCAT10N #04-3051 <br />BY KEVIN AND JULIE FITZPATRICK TO REDUCE TBE REQUIRED <br />LOT AREA, LOT WIDTH AND SIDE YARDS <br />AT 356 WESTLAKE <br />We, the owners oFthe adjacent property to the south oF3S6 Westlake request the City <br />Planning Commission Find the requested variances unreasonable and oppose the granting oFthe <br />variances as not supported by the required Findings For these reasons' <br />1. The Reasonable Eipeclatioas for Redevelopment Along Westlake <br />from the History of Development. <br />The last home on Westlake built on a SO ft wide lot was constructed over 50 years ago The <br />established pattern is private consolidation oFthe underlying SO ft lots (see Exhibit One) into <br />larger parcels either prior to redevelopment or in anticipation of redevdopment (see Exhibit <br />Two). For exampte: <br />309 The existing home was expanded after consolidating the front and back lots to <br />create the buildable parcel with 150 ft oFfrontage <br />34 1 In anticipation of redevelopment the underlying lots have been consolidated <br />into a significant parcel, also with ISO ft of ftontage <br />349 This lot has 100 ft of Frontage on Westlake <br />36S This lot was combined with 373 to provide 100 ft of frontage on Westlake in <br />anticipation of redevelopment with additional consolidation <br />389 lias 1 SO ft of frontage on Westlake <br />372 The owner of 372 acquired the home at 364 and combined the sites in 1999, <br />creating a more conforming parcel, and removed several nonconforming <br />structures and constructed a new home on 372. <br />364 Acquired and made available For redevelopment after a lot line rearrangement <br />with 372 <br />356 Traditional SO ft lot <br />348 Traditional 50 ft lot <br />340 Traditional 50 ft lot <br />332 100 ft wide lot <br />3895 I SO ft wide lot assembled prior to present development <br />iiUil -