My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-20-2004 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
09-20-2004 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2023 1:30:21 PM
Creation date
1/26/2023 1:27:12 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
219
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by ihc City Council of <br />Orono. Minnesota. <br />3. <br />nNDINGS <br />This application wzs reviewed as Zoning File «03-2936. <br />The property is located in the LR - 1C zoning district, which req .r\ a <br />nunimuni lot area of'/; acre and a minimum lot width of 100 feet. Fhe <br />applicants’ property is .49 acres and has a width of 60 feet. <br />'Fhe Planning Commission reviewed this application at a public hearing <br />held on August 18. 2003 and recommended approval of the lot area, lot <br />width and 250-500* zone hardcover variance based on the following <br />findings; <br />a. The property is .49 acres in size when .50 acres is required <br />b. The property has a lot width of 60 feet at the shoreline and 75’ setback <br />w hen 100 ’ is required. <br />c. Because the lot is being reviewed as a rebuild, the lot must conform to <br />current Zoning Ordinance standards or a hardship shall be presented. <br />d. Due to the configuration of the lot. minimal area exists in the 250-500* <br />zone, hence a variance to allow excess hardcover for the pioposed <br />detached garage is not reasonable. <br />e. Because of sight visibility problems on Casco Circle, a turnaround is <br />necessary to safely exit the drive. <br />The City Council has considered this application including the findings <br />and recommendation of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, <br />comments by the applicants and the public, and the effect of the proposed <br />variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community <br />The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are <br />peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property’ in this zoning <br />district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic <br />Pi^e 2 of 6
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.