Laserfiche WebLink
acHifcir Vu <br />MLNUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, October 18, 2004 <br />6:00 o’clock pan. <br />Gaffron stated StVHus noi conducted specific inveniwto deternune that, buU^lhe few msuncei^ <br />they are awaj^f the lots are gen^^ly large enouglj^fet they should be abj^^ meet a 50-foot <br />setbacl <br />It i^s the consensus oUne Planning Com^sston to leave the 50^t setback as is <br />^Bremer recommend the second poy^ul in (cX2) be el.ir.i^d and the axpers^ between wear <br />and tear be ^^ged to the wore <br />Rahn na^ed, Frltzler sec^f^ed, to recommend anproval of the propg^d amendment to <br />Secitan 78-1577(c) redfrding exterior storag^R Districts, cslaUlUhing a onc-tiinc permit^ <br />pre-existing useryn continue the storage^large vehicles u^r certain conditions. <br />VOTE: Aye^NaysO <br />3. #04-3052 ERIC VOGSTROM, 2618 CASCO POLNT ROAD - VARIANCES, <br />6:17 p.m. - 6:36 p.m. <br />Enc Vogslrom, Applicant, was piesent <br />Curtis noted this application was before the Planning Commission at its September meeting and was <br />tabled to allow the applicant lime to redesign his plan in an effort to reduce hardcover on the lot. <br />Since that time the applicant has submitted another plan and is now requesting a hardcover variance <br />for 38.9 percent hardcovxr wuhai the 75-250’ setback aone, a vanincc for sidr street setback of <br />10 feet where a 15-foot setback from the adjacent nght-of-way is nomully required, and an average <br />lakeshore setback variance to encroach 5 five nearer to the lake than the property to the south. <br />Curtu St *td since the tune of the last itieeimg the appSdcanl has also removed a number of tiecs from <br />the property without city permiL Curtis noted the adjacent neighbor has submr.ed a letter regarding <br />his conccmi with this proposal. <br />PAGES <br />L.,