Laserfiche WebLink
L <br />PUMiag Coombiioi RccoMnicadatioB <br />This application was first heard by the Planning Contmission on September 20^ and was tabled at the <br />applicants request in order to reduce the level of hardcover variance requested. On October 18, 2004, <br />Planning Commission voted 5-2 (Bremer and Rahn cast dissenting votes) to reconunend denial of the <br />hardcover and setback variances based on lack of sufficient hardship. The two dissenting voters <br />would have offered the ai^licant a tabling to allow him time to povide a further revised plan. <br />Planning Staff Recommendation <br />The applicant has proposed to Council a plan with further hardcover reductions hut still requiring <br />variances. Council should refer the application back to the Planning Commission for review of the <br />revised plan. <br />COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED <br />Refer the application back to the Planning Commission in order to review the revised plan, or direct <br />staff to draft a denial resolution for adoption at your November 8“* meeting.