My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-15-2004 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2004
>
11-15-2004 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2023 1:26:30 PM
Creation date
1/26/2023 1:21:05 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
341
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MLMTESOFTHE <br />ORONO PiJiNMNG COMMISSION MEETLNG <br />MoMlay, October It, 2004 <br />0:00 o’clock p.m. <br />(004-3003 WJM Properties, Cooliooed) <br />JohnsoQ ftoled he is confident he can obtain a letter from the insurance agent that would hasKally say <br />the insurance company would like lighting in the parking lot to presen’c the x-alue of the property and <br />to protect the personnel coming in and out. John^ staled they have submitted information <br />concerning the style and shielding of the type of light being proposed, which was approved w ith 25* <br />posts two years ago. <br />Johnson stated an analysis of the lighting options was conducted, with a study of the l(XX)-w’att being <br />submitted to iff. Johnson suted they did not submit the study on the 400-wati lighting but that he <br />does have that mformation av-aitable. <br />Bremer inquired whether any lighting on the building is being proposed. <br />Johnson staled the only lighting on the building that they arc proposing is what currenily exists on the <br />building, which essentially lights the side of the building and is downcast. <br />Fntzler inquired w hether any security people could be brought onto the site. <br />Johnson stated the primary security is the fact that it is a well-lit lot. Johnson stated there would be <br />employees on the site who will also keep on eye on the property. <br />Fntzler noted the front dnveway is secure. <br />Johnson suted the front driveway has a gate that closes across the front of the entrance. <br />Fntzler inquiied whether there would be employees on sue at 2 00 a.m. <br />Johnson stated the potential exists that no one wtnild be on site m the early morning hours uA also the <br />potential that truck dnvers would be on the lot in the early morning hours. <br />Fntzler staled one option is to have a pnvate secunly force patrol the property at periodic times. <br />Fntzler inquired w hether the w hole penmeter of this property would be fenced in. <br />Jtdmson suted the whole penmeter of the property is not fenced m. w ith the fence going from the <br />comer of the building on the north side out to the end of the parking lot and down the eastern <br />boundary about 75 or 80 feet. <br />Bremer mdicated she has a concern that there is not enough information concerning the lighting before <br />the Planning Commission tonight. Bremer suted she would like to see the letter from the msurance <br />company requesting the additional lightmg. Bremer commented Orono has a rural character that they <br />would like to mautUin, and one way to do that is by limiting the amount of lighting. <br />Johnson pointed out that this facility is different from a pnvau residence and will conuin <br />approximately 250 new cars that are attractive to thieves. <br />PAGE 32
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.