My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-15-2004 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2004
>
11-15-2004 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2023 1:26:30 PM
Creation date
1/26/2023 1:21:05 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
341
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETLNG <br />Moaday. October 18,2004 <br />6:00 o’clock p.ni. <br />(804-3058 Tinotky Zwarl, Coatioocd) <br />Zwart stated it is. Zwan sutcd there is a door underneath the stairway into the garage. <br />Cunts Slated she attempted to redesign the dm-eway and mclude the suirw ay hut »a$ not very <br />successful due to the lack of eles-ations being proxided. <br />Zwan staled the stairs go up to a deck. <br />Fntzlcr inquired why elesations were not included. <br />Zwart stated he did not realize he needed to submit clesations. <br />Rahn noted if the stairway is located over tlic dn\ euay. it would automatically be a part of the <br />hardcover calculation. <br />Jurgens inquired w hether there is a deck on the back of the building <br />Zwart suted there is not. <br />Rahn stated in his view the drivcw ay could be reduced somew hat. <br />Jurgens concurred that the dnveway could be reduced somewhat <br />Leslie inquired w hether the location of the house is due to a setback requirement <br />Curtis stated the location of the house was because of the 25 percent hardcover m the one zone. <br />Kempf stated if the driveway were diminished in size, it would be nice to have space to park near the <br />residence to avoid cars havmg to be moved when someone wanu to leave. <br />Rahn pomted out the width of the dnveway by the residence is almost the width of the building, which <br />IS 30 feet, with a stairway in the middle. Rahn slated the stairway is going to project 12.14 feet, with <br />sufTicieni dnv eway on either side of the stairway to allow for a buili-in turnaround Rahn comnvented <br />he does not believ*e i separate turning or parking area would be needed. <br />Fntzler recommended the applicant consider his options for reducing hardcover. Fntzler staled it is <br />difficult to visualize the stairway w ithout a plan. Fntzler noted if the footpnnt of the residence is <br />approved at 1.350 square feet, the applicant would need to stay within that when designing the house. <br />Zwart staled the footpnm would not change. <br />Rahn inquired whether language could be included in the motion basically approving the application <br />but with the condition that the hardcover be reduced. <br />PAGE 21
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.