My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-15-2004 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2004
>
11-15-2004 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2023 1:26:30 PM
Creation date
1/26/2023 1:21:05 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
341
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINI TKSOF rilK <br />ORONO pi.a>mm; <ommissio>- <br />Monday, October IH. 2004 <br />6:00 o'clock p.m. <br />(M4-3042 Pillar llomev I'onlinned) <br />LcnIic sUlcd »n |•..^hlblt C there apireiis to l>e a MX-t*H>t or sevcn-liHit gap beloeen the jhh»1 lUvk and <br />the projicrly line that allows for a swale t«> be coi structed. Leslie stated with the bl«Kk lelaining wall. <br />It iinpacts the amount of room available fm the drainage swale. Leslie inquired wK*iha that is the <br />reason for the claim df water runoff mto the neighbor's inopcriy cuncntly <br />Tup|Kr cuncurreJ there is less space for the swale, but that iIk* swale lus been iiMintained at the p«iiin <br />required by the C ity and still functions exactly as it should <br />I eslic inquired whether llic landscape atchitect wouUI eontest the claim lhal iheic is ineieinciital <br />lunoff as a result of the construction <br />Tupper staled he would. <br />Shermaek (xniilcd out that water seeks the lowest jHiint. which would t>e the .swale with iIh* tiraiii tile, <br />and can be verified by the engineer. Shemiack slated it wa^ his understanding they complietl with <br />every thmg they were requested to do based on what tlicy weic told by the C'lly I rigitwer and Stall <br />Tiqtper staled they did ask Lyle Oman to visit the site piior to llie srul iK-mg laid to have the swales <br />inspected, fupper indicated lie was infoniKd by Oiiuit tiul he lud iiersimally ins|iecled tlic swales <br />and had approved them. <br />Rahn inquired how a building ins^clor is capable of delerminiiig whether a swale is ctuisiiiKied <br />properly Ralm suggested ilic ( ily consider requiring hcforc and alicr surseys to avoid these iv-pcs of <br />problems <br />flipper suted he personally spoke on a mimlicr of iK'casions with Hnice Vang and L>le Oiiun alniut <br />these swales as well as llie ('ily Lnginecr. with the eoiKepl foi this lv|ic of swale with the dram tile <br />and riK'k being anivcd at between the four of them I iip{vi indicated Stall' inloiiiK'd him pilot to <br />construction of the swale that this would Ik: ap}irovcd <br />Kahn inquired w hether tlic contractor is agieeabic to iiukc any changes recommended by the City <br />Fngmeer. <br />Tupper staled they are. <br />Tom Kellogg. City l nginecr. noted he was on site one time only with Urucc Vang a day or two before <br />the Parade of Homes commenced. Kellogg stated one of iltc problems with the pl.m -s that ihac is <br />nothing that identifies the dram tile, so w ithout that iniomuiion. Ins assumption was lhal it was a <br />walking path. Kellogg staled the plan that was submitted fur approval clearly .shows another defined <br />swale and pome grading to divert the wata. Kellogg indicated the as-buill grading plan d«*cs nol agree <br />with th* tviding permit grading plan, particularly along the north lot line. Kellogg staled tlie <br />PAGE 11
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.