My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-15-2004 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2004
>
11-15-2004 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2023 1:26:30 PM
Creation date
1/26/2023 1:21:05 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
341
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MLNLTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />MoMdav, Oclobrr IS, 2004 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />I <br />i <br />(k04*3052 Eric Vogtlrom, Coniinutd) <br />Leslie inquired how many of the neighbors have three car garages \xrsus two car garages. <br />Vogstrom stated it ts appro.\imaieIy half and half, w ith the new er homes having the three car garages. <br />Vogstrom indicated he was attempting to address the off-street parking by constructing a lhrcc<ar <br />garage. Vogstrom noted the current residence is also located on the property line, which makes it <br />nonconfonning. and the amount of hardcover on the lot is also being reduced w ith his propi>sal from <br />what currently exists. <br />Winkey inquired what impact a reduction to 25 percent hardcoser would have on the design of the <br />house. <br />Vogstrom stated he is better off going w ith the 1500 square foot footprint plus a small amount for a <br />driseway and a sidewalk, which would bring the hardcover to around 30 percent. <br />Fntzler commented that in his \icw the size of the lot should give the applicant an adequate building <br />pad and that he would be opposed to granting any \ ananccs. Fntzler stated he would like to see the <br />hardcover reduced to 25 percent. <br />Jurgens staled based on the time limits, he would like to make a motion denying the application. <br />Jurgens moved, Leslie seconded, lo reconuMud denial of Application «04-3052, Eric \’ogslrom, <br />2618 Casco Point Road. <br />Rahn noted the applicant does have the ability lo sign an agreement extending the 60 days. <br />Bremer stated she does not feel the Planning Commission should make a motion based solely on the <br />fact that the 60-day time limit is about to expire. <br />Jurgens stated in his view the hardcover should be reduced to 25 percent and that there is no need to <br />grant any variances based on the size of the building pad. <br />\'OTE: Ayes 5, Nays 2, Rahn and Bremer opposed. <br />Rahn stated he believes the applicant should be given the opportunity to revise his plans again but that <br />he IS in agreement that the hardcover be reduced. <br />Vogstrom inquired wheihcr he could utilize on cnd-Ioadtng garage. <br />Jurgens staled the applicant does have that option but that a new application would need to be <br />submitted. <br />PAGE 6
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.