My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-15-2004 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2004
>
11-15-2004 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2023 1:26:30 PM
Creation date
1/26/2023 1:21:05 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
341
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Xc». 5. 2004 ;2:33PV A*chof BiotV XS? U? <br />2004 11/08 11:28 P4Z II0II88 INSTAKT IBSTtNC/ALUED <br />X: 4055 3 <br />^002 <br />ptnttrometttr (DCF), a sight kilogram (17.6 pound) hainmtr to <br />dri«« a 20 mlllimatar dianetcc conioal point into tha aoil. with tha <br />panetratioa raeordad in millinatars per blow. From tha DCP <br />readings, a per blow, panatration average was recorded and a n-value <br />derived. This R-valua. is ar enipirieal relationship ua have <br />established to agusta tha dprvric cone data to tha more familiar <br />blows per toot (BPP) standard, penetration soil boring tost. <br />Dpnamio Cent Panatromatar Test <br />DCP Pa»th Per Blow ?.'a. / K-Valua Eetimetad Load <br />SSS NM (13.2") 16.S HM / R-21 7000 PSP <br />Eiterior and interior observations of tha rasidanoa indioatad no <br />appacaat structural stress based on soil atrength or elements of <br />the aaisting foundation or svpporting structural mambars. Whila <br />some of the components, per plan 4/kl could bo verified, many <br />details such as beam dimensicis and supporting plera could not be <br />fully sddreeead during this i'^pection. Althovjgh tho original (west <br />section^ 1. expeotad to carry less loading for the now construction, <br />soma sactxons of tha foundatisn aay lack uniform capacity and the <br />struetural cemponents appear to be leas aubatantlal than thoae <br />observed within the newer eas: addition. No would therefore <br />anticipate the installation c{ additional floor joists and supports, <br />ns already recoimended by the contractor. <br />tn our opinion, based on the iforemantioned teat snd observations, <br />tho eubgrada soils below the residence would be expected to meet or <br />exceed the losdbssring regultemants for the proposed construction. <br />We would however anticipate the addition of aoine atruoturel <br />elements, primarily within tht west section of the reaidonce, as <br />part of the new oonstruction. Also, we would recomnend a review by a <br />structural engineer as part of the overall eonatruetion plan. <br />Sincerely, <br />Instant Testing Company <br />^ Gary 8|fudlsh / <br />Senior Bnginoorin^Xnspoeter <br />CC: Perry (Pax: •52-473-3396) <br />#701 - 1 / #605 - 2 / #306 (H DCP / m2 - 53 <br />J
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.