Laserfiche WebLink
FILE ■04-30M <br />OdotMT 14. 7004 <br />Pag* 2 0(4 <br />BsdcfroMid <br />This application was before the Planning Commission at the September 20'*' meeting and <br />was tabled in order for the applicant to redesign and reduce hardcover. Since that time <br />the applicant has met with staff and redesigned the proposal in an attempt to further <br />reduce hardcover. Additionally, the applicant has proceeded with tree removal in <br />preparation for redevelopment of the property. The applicant performed this uork <br />without City approval or permits. The City is now in the process of anals’zing the <br />number of trees lost and an appropriate restoration plan. Staff recommends any vanance <br />approval include implementation of a CouiKil approved restoration plan. <br />LOT ANALYSIS WORSlIF.ET <br />Lot Area/Wldih; <br />LR.IC i Lot Area Lot Width <br />Required 21.780 5 f. C/jacre)100' <br />Actual 1 20.561 s f. (0.47 acre)100' (la' shoreline <br />80' 75' sctbick <br />Setbacks: <br />1 LR-IC Required Esiillng Proposed (Revised) ] <br />Lakeshore 75'j 80' (home) <br />I 78*(deck) <br />Rear 30'30* <br />North Street Side 15'lO' <br />South Side 10'13.2' <br />Amage Lakeshore The home on propert>' lo the south is set back 86*± from the OHV\X; the <br />applicant's proposal shows a 75* setback. Technically, the applicant <br />needs an average lakeshore setback x-anance how*e%rr. lake \iews from <br />the property to the south will not be impacted by the applicant's <br />proposal. <br />Structural Coveraee: <br />Total Lot Area T Total Structural Coveraae <br />.Mloued 3.084 s f. (15*.) <br />3.002 s f (14 6 *i) <br />20.561 s.f. (0.47 acre) <br />Approximately 16.400 s f. not includhfi' , iposed: <br />the portions of the property to the Etut '* .........................—.................... <br />Carman Bay_____________________ Adjusted Allowed; 2.460 i.f.« IS% of 16.400 s.f.