My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-18-2004 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2004
>
10-18-2004 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2023 1:22:53 PM
Creation date
1/26/2023 1:18:03 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
292
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MIMTIuSOFTMi: <br />ORO.NU PLA>.MM; CO.MMISSIO.N MEETING <br />.MMday, September 20,2004 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />(W04-304S Sierra Per^bw, C'oMlatted) <br />Kahn indicalcd the applicant has the option of tabling his application until the results cortK* back on his <br />alternate septic site or have the Planning ('ommission vole on each of the vanances Kahn inquired <br />what the setbacks wmild be if the building w ere reduced to 1200 square feet <br />(iundlach indicated any accesssiry structure over |t>00 tcet has to meet principal structure seibacks. <br />Leslie noted the setback wuuld be 15 feet if the structure were reduced to lOUU square feet. <br />Jurgens indicated he would be willing to make a motion approving the vanance to permit tiv.' propo.sed <br />storage shed to be located nearer the front or street lot line but denying the variance for the north side <br />yard setback and the oversi/ed accessory structure area variance. <br />Bremer indicated she would al.so he in favor of the vanance to permit the pitvposed storage shed to be <br />located nearer the front since that is in her view a more pnvaie location <br />Persian stated his concern with the smaller si/e structure is that the building would Ih* full and that he <br />would prefer to have all of his stuff stored inside. <br />Jurgens commented the applicant would have the option to construct another building if he is stil! in <br />need of additional storage. <br />Jargeas moved. Bremer seconded, to reconunend approval of a vuiaace to permit the proposed <br />Blorage shed to be located nearer the front or street lot line Hum the prkKip^ baiMlax. ami to <br />recommend denial of a north side yard setback variance and oversicH accessory stractare area <br />variance for the properly located at lOOS Hunt Farm Road. <br />Ciundlach stated the applicant would be able to construct a INM square fiHii building but would have to <br />meet the 30*fout setback on the nurth side. <br />VOTE: Ayes 4. Nays 2. LesNe and Fritrlcr Opposed. <br />Leslie stated he wi old prefer to sec the structure built in a liKatiun that meets the C'lty's setback <br />requiremcnt.s <br />Frit/ler indicated he would prefer to vote on the application as a whole rather than on the individual <br />variane-8. <br />6. *04.3049 WOOOIIILL t Ol NTRY CLl B, 200 M UUUIIILL ROAD - ( ONDITIONAL <br />I SE PERMIT. 7:21 p.m. - 7:30 p.m. <br />Mark Albrecht appeared on behalf of the Wuudhill Country Club. <br />GafFhei stated the Woodhill Country Chib is currently undergoing major remodeling of the mam club <br />facilities and is requesting approval for temporary placement of a trailer to be used as an office during <br />PAGE 13
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.