My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-18-2004 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2004
>
10-18-2004 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2023 1:22:53 PM
Creation date
1/26/2023 1:18:03 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
292
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
AppUcalton Date: September 22,2M4 <br />M-Dty Review Etplratloa (SHe flu ): Nmetnber 21,2004 <br />120 Day Rcvlet« Eiplratien (SubdtvtolM): January 20,200S <br />From: <br />Dau: <br />Subject: <br />ChairRahn & Planning Commission Members <br />Ron Moorse, City Administrator <br />Mike Gaffron, Planning <br />October 15,2004 <br />tK>4-3062 “Stonebay Lofts" - Outlot E, STONEBAY ("2670 Kelley Parkway! <br />• Public Hearing: <br />1) RPUD Amendment / Site Plan & Building Plan Appioval <br />2) Final Plat Approval <br />Smmmarv of Rcoucit Applicants request an amendment of ihe Stonebay RPUD for changes to llic <br />condominium (“Lofts") building and site plan, requesting final site plan and building plan approvals as <br />well as final plat approval for Outlot E as a single 2.S acre lot for the condominium building. <br />Property Owncr/Dcveloper: John Terrance Homes LLC <br />Planncr/Enginecr: Land form <br />ArchliccI: Architecniral Works Villard, Inc. <br />]. <br />Staff Recommendation: <br />Planning Commission should review the list of potential issues and determine whether these and/or <br />additional issues require discussion. An option is to review this site plan further at your October work <br />session. Key to your review is to determine whether the major revi.e^ens are acceptable. <br />If Planning Commission concludes that the proposed revisions are ace* “aV then a recommendation <br />for approval would be in order. If Planning Commission concludes tl... one or more of the topics <br />identified in this memo requires further consideration, then tabling wou’.c be appropriate.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.