Laserfiche WebLink
M04-3054 <br />October 1b. 2004 <br />Pate 3 of4 <br />Left Side (south)10’21’40’ <br />Right Side (north)10’63’ - house <br />8.6’-shed <br />10’-house <br />8.6’ - shed <br />Structural Coverage <br />Total Lot Area <br />38,596 s.f. (0.886 acres) <br />Total Structural Coverage <br />Allowed: 5,789 s.f. (15%) <br />Proposed: 3,924 s.f. (10%) <br />Hardcover Calculations <br />Hardcover <br />Zone <br />75-250 <br />250-500 <br />Total Area In <br />Zone <br />7,917 s.f. <br />30,679 s.f. <br />Allowed <br />Hardcover <br />1,979.25 s.f. <br />(25%)____ <br />9,203.7 s.f. <br />(30%) <br />Existing <br />Hardcover <br />0 s.f.* <br />(0%) <br />3,517 s.f.* <br />(11.46%) <br />Proposed <br />Hai^covcr <br />1,283 s f. <br />(16.2%) <br />7,694 s.f. <br />(25.08%) <br />Aftn e.xclusion of fabric or plastic-lined landscape beds <br />Lot Width Variance <br />The applicants own the two existing vacant lots to the north of their home at 4465 Forest <br />Lake Landing. They have combined these lots and removed tlie house tliat existed on the <br />southerly lot. F.ach of these lots is 55 feet in width at the roadway and once combined the <br />width becomes 110 feet. The lot width requirement of the LR - IB zoning district is 140 <br />feet. Because the applicants do not meet this requirement and wish ;o redevelop the lot. a <br />lot width variance is required. Had the lot been 112 feet in width, administrative <br />approval could have been granted, which was the case with the lot’s area. <br />.Accessory Structure Variance <br />lire uppitcaiits have proposed to keep the accessory structure located in the northern <br />comer of the lot. Prior to combination of these lots, the old house was located on the <br />southerly lot and this accessory building existed without a principal stmeture. Only <br />lakeshore lots are permitted accessory buildings located in front of the principal structure <br />and non-lakeshorc lots must locate them behind the principal structure. Because these <br />lots have been combined and redevelopment of the lot is proposed, all accessorv <br />buildings must meet Zoning Ordinance requirements. A variance is required in order lo <br />allow the existing acccs.,ory structure to remain closer to the street than the proposed <br />residence. <br />Hardship Siatement <br />Applicant has provided a brief hardship statement in Exhibit B, and should be asked for <br />additional testimony regarding the application.