My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-16-2004 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2004
>
08-16-2004 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2023 12:48:15 PM
Creation date
1/26/2023 12:44:37 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
260
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
file h &4-3:^o <br />Ajgu»! 9 2X4 <br />P«a# 3 of 3 <br />Side Street Setback Variance <br />The applicants have proposed a detached garage to be set back 212* front the side street <br />lot line where a 50 ’ setback is normally required. The side st-*et in question was fenced <br />and turned into part of the grassed park lawn. It is unimproved right-of-way currently, <br />and indefinitely, being used”as parkland for Cry stal Bay Playground. This unimproved <br />right-of-way serv’es as a side yard and not an improsed. traveled street <br />Hardship Statement <br />Applicant has completed the Hardship Documentation Form attached as Exhibit B. and <br />should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application <br />Hardship Analysis <br />In comiderlng applications for variance, the Planning CtnniniiUon shall cunuder the effect of the <br />proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic <br />conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and me effect on values of property in <br />the surrounding area, the Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances <br />from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances nhere their strict enforcement would cause <br />undue hardship because of circunutances unique to the Individual property under consideration, and <br />shall recommend approval only when It is demonstrated that such actions nill be in keeping with the <br />spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. <br />The size of the lot is consistent with the other properties within this neighborhood and the <br />proposal is not out of character for the neighborhood. Stall' finds tliat due to the size of <br />the lot and the nature of the unimproved side street right-of-way there is hardship to <br />support the 21.2 ’ side street setback where a 50 ’ setback is normally required <br />Issues for Consideration <br />Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? <br />Staff Recommendation <br />Planning Staff recommends appiosal of the side street setback variance as proposed with <br />the following condition; <br />1. I'he existing turn around driveway shall be remosed concunently with the <br />construction of the proposed garage and installation of the new proposed <br />driveway.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.