08-16-2004 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ORC MINXTES OF THE J PLANNING COMMISSION MEET MONDAY, JUNE 21. ;0C4 6.00 o’clock p m. EXHIBIT G (2. «04-?009 JAMES /VND DARCY LOI FLEK, 1690 bllAUVNN OOD ROAD. VARJ.XNCE. REVISED PLAN, PUBLIC HEARING (6:09-6:15 p.m.) Leslie moved, Chair Mabusth seconded, to recommend approval of Application «04-.^009 James and Darcy Lofflcr, 1690 Shads'vsood Road, framing variances needed for the revised plan: 1. Lot area (0.39 acre where 0.50 acre required; docs not meet S0% rule) 2. "5*250' Hardcostr (Proposed =* 3,557 s.f. 10,"80 s.f. in /one - 33.0®where 25?^ is allowed.) 3. Subject to City Engineer acceptance of grading and drainage plan. VOTE: .Ayc$7,.NavsO. Fntzlcr urged the apph.cants to adhere to the approved variances and discouraged the applicants fioni ctilargin? hardcover sutfaces, i c backup apron and deck, in the future Gaffron advised the application would be scheduled for the June 2S. 2004 City Council meeting. Mr Lofflcr thanked the Pla:tning Cc:nmi»sion for their service to the corttiiuniiy NEW BUSINESS .3. W04 3010 THEOnOILE L. CAP1L\, 3534 IW PLACE, \ VlUANC E. CONDI I lONAL USE PERMIT, PUBLIC HEARING (6:15 6:32 p.ni.) Tltcodore Capra, applicant, was present Gundlacli presented the application for a p:cposal to tear down the existing house and rebuild, removing approximately 2,356 s f. of hardcover, althcugh the applicant ;s still requestmg a variance to pcr.r.it 4,676 s f. of hardcover, or 32 86”o The applicant is proposing to remove 320 s f of existing hardcover within the 0-75‘ zone and would then comply with the 0°o hardcover standard for the 0*75’ zone The lot meets the 'i acre standard as well as the width standard Gun llach pointed out the proposed house plans leave or. y 349 s f for allowable non-structural hardcove r and if the applicant wctc to constr-ct the proposed 3-^stall gaiage at the toad, 1.36S s.f of driveway hardcover would not be necessary In sunmury. she stated the applicant ’s property is conforming in area and vv.dth, ai*d the proposed application mcc.s ail other setbacks, including removal of the non conforming detached garage at the road and the non confomning shed located at the lake. She stated staff finds that no valid hardships inherent to the land to warrant approval of the hardcover *. inancc. Further, Gundlach advised the applicant requests a conditional use pem.it to allow grading all the way down to the shore. Proposed site grading would consist of a substantial f.il amount on the street and side of the home, w hich docs not require a CUT unless it exceeds 500 cubic yards. Gundlach refered to the City Engineer review comments in Exhibit F of the staff report, dated June 17, 2004 Page 3 of 22 J