Laserfiche WebLink
•04-3010 <br />AugutI 16. 2004 <br />Page 3 of J <br />Right Side (south)10* <br />26 2 ’ - house <br />73’ - detached <br />garage <br />//• ] <br />(10* was previously <br />proposed) <br />Lakeshore 75* <br />1 <br />91.5’ - house <br />18.5’-shed <br />1 <br />88 • <br />( previously 90 ’ - <br />house ) <br />Average Lakeshore 71.5* - 98.5' (going <br />north to south) <br />110’ -94* <br />(conforming) <br />88' <br />(94 ’ prev iously) <br />Structural Coverage <br />Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage <br />Allowed. 3.289 s f (I5*b) <br />Proposed: 3,128 s.f. (14.3%) <br />Previously Proposed: 3.208 s f. (14.6°b) <br />Hardcover Calculations <br />(A t>po was made on the on lire previous report regarding the square footages in each <br />zone, however this typo did not affect the hardcover levels proposed. It is now <br />j Hardcover <br />Zone <br />Total .\rca in <br />Zone <br />Allowed <br />Hardcover <br />Exi.i.ng <br />Hardcover <br />Proposed ! <br />Hardcover i <br />0-75 7.698 s.f.Osf 320 s.f.* <br />(4«b) <br />Os.f <br />(0%) <br />75 - 250 14.228 s f.3.557 s f. <br />(25%) <br />7.032 s f • <br />(49«o) <br />4,306 s.f. <br />(30 ’c) <br />Previous i <br />4.676 s f 1 <br />(52 86<^b) 1 <br />drivewavs never approved by the City. <br />Issues for Consideration <br />1. Should this conforming lot be gr.mted a hardcover variance? <br />2 What level of ground disturbance should be allowed within the 0-75' lake yard? <br />3. Should the applicant be encouraged to reduce the footprint of the house, which is <br />currently proposed at 2,288 square feel, not including the garage even though the <br />structural coverage requirement is met? <br />StalT Recommendation <br />Staff recommends denial of the hardcover variance and conditional use permit request <br />The applicant should be encouraged to reduce the size of the hou .• and dr garage <br />Staff also recommends denial of the conditional use permit request as cuncntly <br />presented. Following a site visit from the City Engineer the applicant will be directed <br />an alternative solution for restoring the slope located between the 934 and 944 elevations.