06-21-2004 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

•04-30M May 12.2004 Fata 3 The other factor that comes into play is &c length ofthc lot and the neighboring homes ’ proximity to the lake. While applicant proposes to place his home to meet the 75’ setback, the homes on either side are located just 55 ’ from the shoreline, so applicant would potentially be depr.ved of lake vtc\fc s as he moves his new home closer to the road to reduce hardcover. Mo v.ng closer to the road also negatively affec*.s the average setback line for both neighbors, changing it to make their homes less conforming. Planning Comznistioa must determine whether this potential reduction in vie\^ s and the inpacts on adjoining average setback lines, by moving the house nearer dte road, is a hardship that just;f.es the magnitude ofhardcover variances requested. From staffs perspective, quantifiable and justifiable TS-ISO* hanlcover variances Include 3 23 sf due to lot shape and 261 sf in the proposed backup apron. Total allowable 7S-2S0’ hardcover would then be 2,525 323 261 - 3.109 sf, (30.8%) as compared to the 4.297 sf (42.5%) proposed. Staff would recommend as a st<irting point that the driveway be reduced in w'idth fiom 13' to I O’ for the first 50* from the road, reducing hardcover by 150 s.f Additional reductions in hardcover should be considered to bring this property nearer the 30.8% level. LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Lot Aree/Widtht LR-IC Lot Area Defined Lot Width Required 21,780 s.f. (0.5 acre)100 ’ Actual 16,283 s.f. (0.37 acre)80’-83’ Setbacks: LR-IC Required Existing Proposed Street (West)30’(to be removed)69- Lake (East)75’(ro be removed)75’ Right Side (South)iO*(to be removed)IT house, 10 ’ deck Left Side (North)10'(to be removed)lo- Average Lakeshore No Encroachment (All homes in line)No encroachment Midi