Laserfiche WebLink
L <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />OROKO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />MONDAY. MAY 17.2004 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />(14. M4.3016 H£.NRYLAZ.MARZ.CoBtiwMd) <br />ipprox’al should address the Issues for Consideration the staff recontmendation. as found on Page 8 and 9 of <br />the Suff Report. May 14.2004. <br />Henry Lazniarz. applicant, conveyed that there is now an easement agreement w.th the Mary Dunn for road <br />access to Brown Rrad. The agreement has been submined to the Dunn's. <br />Tom Goodrum. Schocll and Madson. planner for the applicant, explained that in an effort to preserve the <br />property physical amenities and to create a residential enclav’e wnth clustering the homes, the house pads are <br />SO* X 80' and are expecting estaie>style homes to built. Mr. Goodrum commented the laytMit features a massed <br />relationship and docs not now force additional homes next to the two back to back homes on the south. He <br />expressed the plat layout was redesigned to accommodate the neighborhood and the Planning Commission's <br />concerns from earlier meetings. Trees loss will occur but is focused into one area with the clustering of the <br />home sites and are looking to plant boulevard trees and providing perimeter screening with trees looking both <br />inward and outward. He indicated the 18*'o slopes though not very lung provide a natural setting fur walkout <br />style houses. <br />Mr. I.azniar7 added the road placement is proposed where the existing driveway is now to mmimi/c site <br />disruption. <br />Mr. Goodrum concluded by stating the house w ill be custom-built and sensitive to the site, noting the grading <br />plan shown probably is exceeding what will occur. <br />Chair Mabusth asked for information about the final slopes behind the house pads. Mr. Goodrum <br />explained there is a 6’ drop over 50* distance which is a 12“'. slope. Mr. Lazniarz assured the Planning <br />Commission that even though the plans indicated house pads 50' x 80* as a conservative example, he expects <br />no actual house to be constructed to that size. Mr. Lazniarz added their intent is to maximize the space <br />between homes. It was confirmed that only one principal stnicture with attached garages are proposed for the <br />site. <br />Chair Mabusth invited comments from the public. <br />Kevin Bigelow. 32 Apple Glen Road. Long Lake, questioned if the plans still propose using their dead-end <br />road. Mr. Lazniarz confirmed the PRD only proposes the extension of sewer and water from Long Lake. <br />Chair Mabusth offered Mr. Bigelow a copy of the Staff Report, dated May 14.2004. for more information. <br />Doug Coleman. 140 S. Brown Road. Kallestad Acres, asked for confirmation of the proposed rear yard <br />setbacks. It was confirmed there would be a 50' rear yard setback to the Kallestad Acres lots and at least 75' <br />setback to creek. <br />Sandy Coleman, 140 S. Brown Road, Kallestad Acres, asked if the existing home would remain. She w as told <br />that the plans mdicated the existmg home would be kept on site. <br />Mr. Lazniarz stated the sewer and water easement will be run down the easement w ith Dunn’s and it w ill be <br />provided sewer and water as part of the agreement. <br />Mr. Coleman asked for more information about the removal of trees and final slopes at the knoll. Mr. <br />Goodrum explained that from the Kallesud Acres property there is a 50 ’ setback and no grading is expected <br />within this sedack. so that no trees will be aflccted within 50 ’ of the Coleman’s lot line. <br />Page 34 of 40