Laserfiche WebLink
MINXTESOFTHE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />MONDAY, MAY 17. 2004 <br />6:00 o ’clock p.m. <br />12. MM-3014 TIMOTHY POWERS, 3210 NAVARRE LANE, VARIANCE, PUBLIC HEARING <br />(9:37.9:55 p.m.) <br />Lyim Powers, 3210 Navanre Lane, applicant, wr i present. <br />Ganion presented the application for a 24.5' rear >-ard setback \-anance when 30 is normally required and <br />24.5* currently exists m order to construct a seconid story abo\-e the existing first story residence, and to add <br />two garage stalls. The application is for a remodeling of the existing structure and not a rebuild, and submmed <br />an opmion that the existing foundation will support the 2"* story addition. The existing garage is 24 5' from <br />the rear lot line, and is proposed to be expanded eastward at that same setback. Gaffron adsised the applicant <br />proposed to remos-e the existing shed in an cflbri to decrease the non<onforming rear yard. He pointed out <br />the adjacent lot to the north is the neighbor most affected by the nonconforming rear yard setback, however, <br />the applicant's rear yard is acting as that neighbor's side year, where a 10* setback would nomully be <br />requir^. <br />Gaffion indicated staff recommends approx-al of the rear >'ard setback as submined, including the removal of <br />the existing shed. He adsised there were no hardcoxer issues to be addressed. Gaffron noted that if ui the <br />future the applicant wants to install the circular driveway it would require the Public Scrxices Director review- <br />and approval. <br />Lynn Powers, applicant, explained the architectural plans do show a more formal entry with a circular <br />driveway but that is not being requested at this lime. Chair Mabusth advised that three curb cuts on a smaller <br />property might be difficult to acquire permits. Ms. Powers replied that if the circular dnxeway becomes <br />impossible than perhaps a walkway could be considered <br />Ms. Powers confirmed they were advised the existing foundation can support a second story addition as it has <br />good footings. <br />Chair Mabusth invited the public to comment. <br />Julie Copeland, 2180 Kenwood Way. stated she is the neighbor to the rear of the subject property. She <br />indicated she is about 60' from the house and privacy is her primary concern. With a second story addition, <br />she explained she would be more exposed, and noted that her side >Tird is where she plays with her dogs. Ms. <br />Copeland asked for information about whether there will be a fence, what type of vegetation will be used, what <br />type of rooms will be on the second story and that the property is being impruxed for mxestment purposes, but <br />that she plans to remain. <br />Ms. Powers confirmed that it is an investment property. She explained they intend to put up a nicer fence than <br />what IS there currently and will try to accomm^ate any issues of privacy. The second story mam view will be <br />to the front not to the rear yard. Ms. Powers stated the second story would have a master bedroom with bath, <br />a walk-m closet, another bath and a smaller bedroom. The part of the house facing Ms. Copeland ’s property <br />will have smaller windows, about 24.30" in size. She also suted the existing shed and deck w ill be removed <br />Chair Mabusth asked for further public comments. There w ere none <br />Fritzler oNived, LesUe seconded, to rccommeod approval of AppttcalloB «04-3014, Timothy and Lyaa <br />Powers, 3210 Navarre Laae, graallag a rear yard setback variaacc to allow a rear yard setback of 24.5' <br />whea 30* U aoramlly rcqalrcd aad 24.5’ carreiMly exists ia order to coastrtKt a secoad story above the <br />cxlstlag first story, aad to add two garage staUs, aad to recoauMMl approval of tbc plaas as sobmitlcd, <br />lacladUig the reowval of tbe cxistlBg sbed. <br />Page 28 of 40