My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-21-2004 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2004
>
06-21-2004 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2023 12:40:13 PM
Creation date
1/26/2023 12:35:43 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
324
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />MONDAY. MAY 17. 2004 <br />6:00 o’clock p m. <br />(9. N04-3008 Stcvrn Vairk and Ralph Palmer, Conlinucd) <br />Mr. Valek stated he would accept the dnveway condition and would deal with the potential of moving the <br />dnv'cwny at a future time <br />Bremer moved, l.eslie seconded, to recommend approval of Application (t04-300M. Steven X'alek and <br />Ralph Palmer, 4720 and 47S0 Tonkaview, respectively, to re-plat five (5) lots (four tax parcels) existing <br />lais to create three (3) lots with the stipulation that the existing driveway at 4720 Tonkaview Lane <br />should be abandoned and relocated entirely within the property boundaries of this lot. <br />VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0, Abstain I. <br />Gaffron advised the application would be forwarded ;o the June 14. 2004 City Council meeting <br />10. 004-3009 JAMES AND DARCY LOFFLER, 1690 SHAD>AVOOD ROAD. VARIANCE. PCBI.IC <br />HEARING (8:05-8:32 p.ro.) <br />James and Darcy I olTler. applicants, wac present. <br />Gaffron acknowledged receipt of a letter from John and Joan Fit/patrtek. PIO Shadswinxl Road, dated .May <br />12. 2004, which supptsrted the variance request to e.xcecd the 25% hardcover rcquirenwnt <br />Gaffron mtroduced the application for a hardcover variance to construct a new residence on the property. <br />Other vanances that are needed for the proposed plan include <br />1 . Lot area (0.37 aere where 0.50 acre required, does not meet 80"i rule) <br />2. Lot coverage by stmcturcs is proposed at 1 6.3"o where only 1 5”o is allowed as the recent sursey work is <br />show mg the lot is actually smaller than the 1986 survey. <br />3. 75-250' Hardcover (Proposed *4.297 s f /lO.lOOs.f m zone ■ 42.5"i where 25“o is allowed) <br />Gaffron noted the site has an older home on it situated within the U-75’ setback, with a detached garage also m <br />a non-confomiing location I he applicant intends to remtne all existing strviclures and the new house will <br />meet average setback and 75' setback, as well as all other required setbacks <br />GalTron explained that neighboring homes' are liK'atcd just 55' from the shvircltne, so the applicant would <br />potentially be deprived of lake views as the new home is moved closer to the road to reduce hardcover <br />Moving closer to the road also negatively alTccts the average setback line for both ncighKirs. changing it to <br />make their home less confomimg. <br />Gaffron recommended approval of the lot area vanance, denial of the lot cov erage v-anance and to approve <br />some degree of hardcover variance m the 30-3 l*ii range raihcr than 42"« as proposed. From suff s <br />perspective, there is some hardship to support approval of a modest variance based on the lot shape and tlic <br />need for a backup apron to allow forward vehicle movement onto Shady wood Road <br />Gaffron mtroduced the issues for Consideration as listed m the Stall Report, dated May 12. 2004 <br />He also confirmed that the Planning Commission and applicant receiv ed the full set of pages for the May 12. <br />2004 Staff Report. <br />James Lofner. applicant, introduced his w ife. Darcy, and Jeff Schneider, architect for the applicants, stated <br />that as of today's surveyor re-measurement the lot area is 16.723 s.f.. which is 0 1 acre larger than before. He <br />expressed appreciation for the opportunity to share their view s of the existing property hardships. .Mr Loftier <br />staled they are trying to build a reasonable property and working with the ordinances, indicaimg it is not <br />possible to build a master bedroom on the first floor as the house plan is not large enough and they cannot <br />build more than a two-car garage due to hardcover restrictions. He illustrated that by moving the house further <br />Page 21 of40
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.