Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />FILE M4.3C28 <br />Jun* 16 20C4 <br />Pag* 2 0(4 <br />Lot Area <br />(Kf«S) <br />LotWidm <br />(feet) <br />Ffo«Y«<l <br />(feet) <br />Side Yard <br />(feet) <br />i Side Yard Aejactnl to <br />I Street (feet) <br />RcwYvdtfeet) <br />2 200 SO 30 Iso 50 <br />Sec. 7S-140S. Noaeacroacliments <br />(6) In side yards only, no accessory smicture shall be closer than ten feet from any <br />fide lot line. <br />Sec. 82-2. Dcflnitions <br />Property line means the boundary lines enclosing a lot, parcel or tract of land. <br />Regardless of the legal description, the property line to be used for purposes of <br />compliance with chapter 78 and this chapter shall be the ordinary high water mark of any <br />lakeshore, the edge of the right-of-way, the edge of any public or private roadway, or the <br />edge of an adjacent lot or outlot <br />LUt of Eahibits <br />A. Application <br />B. Ha^hip Documentation Form <br />C. Existing & Proposed Survey/Site <br />Plan <br />D. Plat Map showing 66’ right-of-way <br />E. Buildable Area <br />F. Proposed Plans and Elevations <br />G. Photos <br />H. Aerial photos <br />I. Property Owners List <br />J. Plat Map <br />Backgrouad <br />The applicanu are the o\%ners of 92S Old Long Lake Road. Currently the property is <br />being used as a rental property, however, the owners would like to rebuild a home on the <br />site and change this to their primary residence. At the pre-application meeting with City <br />Staff the applicants were informed of the required 30’ side setbacks and were advised to <br />redesign their plans to meeting those setbacks on both side lot lines as the proposal would <br />be reviewed as a rebuild. The property o>^ners feel that there is hardship due to the <br />relative narrowness of their lot - compared to the depth - that the house they are <br />proposing is the most efficient use of the property and decided to go forward with their <br />variance request. <br />During the review it was noted that the applicants used the edge of the paved road to <br />define the front lot line, this is inconect, and as a result a front setback variance of 40* is <br />proposed rather than 62* as shown on the plan. <br />LOT ANALYSIS WORSHEET <br />Lot AreaAVidth; <br />RR-IB Lot Area Lot <br />Width <br />Required 87.122 s.f (2 acre)200* <br />Actual Dry buildable exclusive of road * 48,740 s.f. = 1.12 acres 100 ’