Laserfiche WebLink
#2484 - Woodhill CC <br />May 5. 1999 <br />Page 7 <br />nHvewav Standards. The proposed driveway is subject to the driveway standards <br />of Municipal Code Section 6.05, Subdivision 10 "Uusiness Driveways, Approaches <br />and Turnarounds". Tliose standards which may be applicable to the current request <br />include- <br />Only one business driN-eway is allowed per development unless approved by <br />City <br />Must be paved (bituminous) within the rirht-of-way <br />- Driveway approach to be at least 100* from a corner in a residential district <br />. Must be 10' from side lot line <br />Tlic proposed driveway is a second driveway to the Club. The proposed driveway <br />is gravel, not paved. Tlie standard for a drivewny approach being 100* from a comer <br />has, at best, dubious applicability in Uiis ease due to the linear nature of the road and <br />driveway layout. Tlie proposed driveway is cx.ictly 10 ’ from the lot line abutting the <br />property to the immediate south, and more than 10* from the property to t!ic north. <br />I and Alteration Permit Land alteration in excess of that auihori7cd by a drivew ay <br />pcmiit or when not authorized in conjunction with a building pennit. requires, at a <br />minimum, a staff administered land alteration pennit per Section 10.03, Subd 19-21. <br />Wlien the volume of land alteration e.xceeds 500 cubic yards, a Conditional Use <br />Permit is required Staff is authorized to refer land alteration pemiit requests to <br />Council for volumes less than 500 c.y. if staff concludes the work may create negative <br />impacts or be not in keeping with the goals and policies of tlic Comprehensive Plan. <br />While from all information gathered to date it appears the volume of grading in <br />conjunction with this access work was significantly less than 500 c.y , the proposal <br />docs "potentially create negative impacts" in the opinion of staff, specifically related <br />to diainage, noi^c, odors, visual impacts and public safety, all of which should be <br />reviewed by the Council given the neighborhood concerns. <br />con^micdop^tion of the private golf courses (Rural Park and Open Space Policy <br />#8 on page CMP 8-12) because they provide acsttietic open space and natural vistas <br />to the benefit of adjacent landowners and the general public. <br />In regards to Rural Transportation Policies, the CMP in Policy #7 on page CMP 7-13 <br />states that "Driveway locations and rural street or private road intersections w-ill be <br />limited for traffic safety...", the intent being to consolidate access points onto major <br />roads. <br />Urban Land Use Policy #6 on page CMP 4-18. states that "Commercial and industrial <br />development will not be permitted to adversely affect neighboring residential <br />property...". While Woodhill is not strictly a commercial or industrial use, certain <br />aspects of its operation may have impacts tliat arc not strictly residential in nature, <br />and that is why private golf courses are a conditional use rather than a permitted use.