Laserfiche WebLink
H0I3033 <br />JuU 19.2004 <br />Page 3 of 4 <br />Rear 30 ’79 ’39' <br />Left Side 10*9.3’ |21.5- <br />Right Side 10*10 r 1 10* <br />. ______________________________ <br />1 Lakeshore 75*100' house <br />81'deck <br />' 98' house <br />85' deck <br />j .Average Lakeshore 42*-60 ’ (west-east)99' house <br />82' deck <br />98' house <br />85' deck <br />Structural Coverage <br />Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage <br />I Allowed; <br />I Proposed <br />26.925 s f. (0.61 acres)4.038.75 s.f. (15%) <br />3.805 s f. (14%) <br />Hardcover Calculations <br />Hardcover <br />Zone <br />Total Area <br />Zone <br />Allowed <br />Hardcover <br />I Existing <br />Hardcover <br />Proposed <br />llai^cover <br />0-75 6.395 s f Os.f <br />(0“o) <br />sf • <br />("/o) <br />Osf. <br />(0%) <br />75 - 250 20.530 s.f.5.132.5 s.f. <br />(25%)____ <br />s.f.* <br />(%) <br />5.116 s.f <br />(24.92qo) <br />After exclusion of fabric or plastic-lined landscape beds <br />Lot ArcaAVidth Variance <br />Tins lot is located within a one acre 7one and requires 140 feet of width at the shoreline <br />and at the 75 foot setback ITtc lot is approximately 0.6 acres with only 37 5 feet of <br />width at the shoreline and 107.5 feet of width at the 75 foot setback. Therefore, the lot is <br />non-conforming in area and width and requires approval of these variances in order to <br />rebuild. The Zoning Ordinance allows for administrative approval when the lot meets <br />80®/o of the zoning district requirements, however this lot is only 62% of the area <br />requirement and 48% of the width requirement at the shoreline and 77% of the <br />requirement at the 75 foot setback. <br />Hardship Statement <br />Applicant has provided a Hardship Documentation Form as Exhibit D. and should be <br />asked for additional testimony regarding the application. <br />Hardship AnalysU ________________________________________________________ <br />In consUerltti appUeations for variance, ihe Ptamnbtg Coouniithn shatt caraider the effea of rite <br />proposed varioaee upon the heoUh, safety and wetfore of the eoamaalty, existing and anticipated <br />traffic comdUom, tighi and air, danger cf fire, risk to the pahtic safely, and the effect on vaiaes of <br />property bt the sarroanding area. The Ftanning Commission shatt consider recommending approval <br />far variances from the iiterai provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their urict <br />enfotcemetu woatd cause undae hardship because of circumstances unique to the IndivMiai <br />property under consideration, and iholt recommend approval onty when it Is demonstrated that suck <br />actions wiU be In keeping with the spirit and Intent of the Orono Zoning Code.