07-19-2004 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

H04.303S July 19.2004 PateJorJ 71te applicant ’s property lies within the 2 acre zoning district where many homes have conditional use permits for plumbing The applicants lot abuts a cid-de-sac to the northeast, wetland to the direct north. County Road 6 to the south and a substantial wetland to the west The closest residential lot is to the east where the septic sites are closer to the cabana than the house. Staff does not anticipate any detrimental effects of adding plumbing ti. the pool cabana b. The council finds that the plumbing fixtures proposed are in keeping with the intended use of the accessory building. The applicant has proposed a toilet, sink, and shower which are all permitted fixtures under the CUP requirements for plumbing in an accessory building c. The property is 2.0 acres in area or larger. The property is 6 3 acres in area Even w hen the wetland area is deducted the property would still have well over 2 0 acres of dry buildable property d. The accessory building is conforming in location, size and height. The pool cabana is under ~50 square feet where a 10 ’ setback is required The e.xisting setbacks are in compliance at 113 ’from the wetland and 320 from Co. Rd 6 e. Tlic property owner agrees to the filing of a covenant in the title of the property providing that the accessory building will not be; 1. Used for a home occupation unless specifically approved by the city or if allowed by this Code. 2. Used as a dwelling unless a guest house conditional use permit is obtained. 3. Rented. lca;cd or otherwise pro\ided for use as a dwelling under any circumstances. The applicants have indicated they will not use the building for any of the use:^ listed above. The resolution approving the conditional use permit for plumbing will include execution of this covenant As noted above, the applicants arc able to meet all standards established by the conditional use permit section of the Zoning Ordinance pertaining to plumbing in an accessory building. Staff cannot anticipate any negative impacts and would recommend approval of the CUP request Issues for Consideration 1. Can the Planning Commission anticipate any unforeseen negative impacts? 2. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Staff Kecommcndalion Approval of the conditional use permit as requested stipulating the applicants agree to execute the covenant mentioned herein staling the use will not be used for a home occupation, dwelling unit, or reniedicased. L