Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />CiTYoTORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. __LL61 <br />75’-250’ zone, 30*/i m the 250’-500’ zone and 35% in the 500’-1000’ <br />zone. <br />4. Section 7S-1403: Variance to pe.Tnit ;6% Lot Coverage by Structures <br />when 15% is normally pemv.rted <br />5. Scctjon 78-1467 (3): Vanance to pemiit an existing sign to be located 2’ <br />outside the property boundary <br />6. Section 7S-1516: V'ariance to parking stall requirement where City <br />Ordinance would technically requite U7 stalls and only 104 stalls arc <br />proposed <br />WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the application; the recommendation <br />of the City staff and Planmng Ccmmission, and the comments and WTittcn statements <br />submitted by the applicant <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Orono, <br />Minnesota hereby denies die requested conditional use permit, commercial site plan <br />review and associated variances as desenbed above based on cnc or more of the <br />following findings of fact concerning this propeny; <br />I <br />3. <br />The property is in close proximity to the residential neighborhood to the <br />south Tlic entrance and parking area for the proposed use directly abuts <br />the adjacent residential neig.hborhood <br />The poic.-itial for increased levels of noise, traffic, activity, public <br />disturbances, litter, damage to property, and calls to police that can <br />accompany a site which serves liquor, have a high potential to be <br />disruptive to the immediately adjacent residential neighborhood <br />Tnc City Council on March 22, 2004 denied a liquor license for the <br />proposed Class II restaurant. <br />The granting of the requested variances would be contrary to the <br />provisions of Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-123 with which the <br />applicant must first comply in order that variances be granted The <br />Council finds that: <br />Page 2 of 4