Laserfiche WebLink
PLE i04-302S <br />June 15 20C4 <br />FaO*9of5 <br />Imum for Considcraiioo <br />1. Docs the Planning Commission feel that there is hardship to rebuild the deck to <br />the same size as it was before? <br />2. Is the deck “necessary”? Does the Planning Commission agree with staffs <br />conclusion that a deck is the safer alternative on this property due to the proximity <br />to the bluff? <br />Are there any other issues or concerns with this application?3. <br />Staff Rccomincndation <br />Planning Staff recommends approval of the after-the-fact lake setback, bluff impact zone <br />setback, and hardcover variances.