Laserfiche WebLink
FUEiOOOII <br />•toy 11.2004 <br />Pi0t3ol3 <br />HarMipAulytb <br />lm€mnUfrtmammtM m/w wwrtoTf. to» Plummimg C»mmhtim»lmM€9m timk*effett»fik* <br />iiW xmrtm rt y tor mmd wt^mte tf ike n—■■■!». ocfatof ■Hr^^toiW 4n^glf <br />€m»Mmn,ilgkl9$»dmir.4mttr9ffirt.rbkmike^mklicmft9,mHdiketffKtmt if tow to tor <br />tmfrmmmrnmgmnm. The mmrnlag CmmmhHm tkmM rmtiitr nrmmmfm^img a^nvml ftrvmHmmcn fnm <br />kecmmif tfeinmmtmmnt ■■iy r to ike pnftr^ mmSer tmmidff writm, mmd ikmH <br />rt<mmtm4 tmnvml»mfy when kb 4tmmu»n0ri that UKk aeiimu wmheim kttfimM wkk Ik* ifirkami <br />kbem ^ kte Onm» Itming Cede. <br />SlafT finds that due to the existing vegetation, the orientation of the e.xisting driveway and <br />the location of wetlands to the rear of the properly there is a hardship lo justify granting the <br />front yard setback variance as well as the variance to be nearer the front lot line than the <br />principle siructuie. Should the applicants be required to meet the 100’ frimt yard setback <br />significant tree removal would be needed There is an existing clearing at the location <br />where the detached garage is proposed and little vegeution removal would be required. <br />Issues for Conakkratlun <br />Arc there any other issues or concerns with ;his application? <br />Stair RccamncmlatlMi <br />Planning Staff recommends approval of the variances as requested. Because the site plan is <br />not a certified survey, a survey will be required before this is presented to Council for final <br />action.