05-17-2004 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

*04>2974 SiMicbay Markn place Mty 13.2004 rtgfi ■ Buildings on the site shall be oriented with a goal ofproviding an inviting vehicle and pedestrian entry fiom Kelley Park\vay without creating negative visual impacts for the Stonebay residential development. Staff Conclusion: Tit is parameter has been met by the reorientation of the Walgreens entrance to the southwesterly comer of that building, and by designing the middle retail building (Retail B, east elevation on Plan Sheet EL2) to have a windowed front facade at its northeasterly end ■ Arcliitectural design and details shall be carefully prepared by any developer of the site to ensure a liigh quality of design, compatible witli the quality of the office buildings on Kelley Parkway, and shall be subject to City approval through the PUD process. Staff Conclusion: This parameter can be met subject to PC'Council approuti of preliminary building designs ■ Building materials shall be high quality and durable, slull be compatible w ith the quality' of the office buildings on Kelley Parkway, and shall be subject to City approval through the PUD process. Staff Conclusion: This parameter can be met subject to PC^Council approx al of preliminary building designs Conformity to B-6/PUD Standards A. Aitowed Uses. Based on a compilation of the allow'able uses in the B-1 and B-6 Districts, Planning Commission has produced a list of permitted and conditional uses that would be appropriate for this site as part of the PUD rezoning process. The proposed buildings and site layout w ould reasonably accommodate many of the indivHdual uses on the proposed list of allowable uses. B. Lot Area A Width. Required area and width for B-6 are 2.0 acres and 100'. The proposed preliminary plat creates two lots: Lot 1»1.98 acres / 370', and Lot 2 ■ 1.71 acres and 135'. Both lots arc slightly undersized in area; how e> er, the site at 3.69 acres is limited by having no additional land available. Staff recommends approval of the lot area and widths as proposed. C. Sabaeks. Setback requircmentsandconfoimitywcre included in the April ISmcmo, indicating that all setback requirements are met except for the w cst side setback for the westerly retail building, which is proposed at 2(f rather than 35'. Staff recommends approval for this 20* setback as discussed in the April 15 memo. D. Site Drainag e. The applicants have provided a drainage plan that includes catch basins and storm sew'ers discharging to the adjacent regional pond. The City Engineer’s letter of April 28 indicates the proposed plans are acceptable subject to a number of conditions to be met prior to final plan approval.