Laserfiche WebLink
F)k <br />jMwiry 30.2004 <br />Pagt 10 of 11 <br />recommend thit the Planning Commission consider **Kours of Operation” conditions, <br />keeping in mind that the restaurant is adjacent to a residentiary zoned area. <br />The applicant is also proposing a trash receptacle to be used in conjunction with the <br />proposed restaurant. It must be setback 10* from the south lot line and located further <br />west east, or against the building in an effort to keep it away from the residential <br />dwelling adjacent to the property. It should also be sufficiently screened <br />Issues for Dlicuuioo <br />1. Should greater setbacks be required for the existing gravel parking lot to allow <br />establishment of a formal green-space yard? If so, what is appropriate? How many <br />parking stalls are needed to adequately serve the site? <br />Should the City require that the existing gravel parking area be paved and striped? <br />Should the existing lower parking area be re-strip^? <br />3.Should the Platming Commission requite specific exterior building materials for the <br />proposed entrajKes, or should the applicant be free to submit plans for a building <br />permit using any of the materials outlined in Section 78-646 (B)? <br />Should any additional screening be implemented along the southern property line? <br />Should trash facilities be located adjacent to the buildmg radter than near the <br />residential lot line? <br />Should the sign located in the Kelly Avenue right-of-way be eliminated in exchange <br />for a larger sign at the northeast comer of Shoreline Drive and Kelly Avenue, which <br />would incorporate all the businesses occupying the building? <br />6. Is the lighting plan appropriate? <br />Should the proposed sign at the northeast comer of Shoreline Drive and Kelly <br />Avenue be required to be a monument style sign rather than a pole style? Should it <br />be oriented perpendicular to Shoreline Drive, or is the angled orientation proposed <br />acceptable? <br />8. Should “Hours of Operation** be specified for the restaurant? If so. what hours are <br />appropriate? <br />9. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? <br />Staff Recommendation <br />Planning Department staff recommends the following: <br />1) Approval of a commercial site plan incorporating the following: <br />a) The upper gravel parking lot be further refined in accordance with the <br />Planning Commission's recommendation regarding the amount of green <br />space to be estabUsbed and the number of new stalls to be constructed.